Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs 2.3x less per output token than Qwen3.7 Plus ($0.555 vs $1.28 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.555
0
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
36
vs boards won of 36 shared

Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Small 3.1 24B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Small 3.1 24B for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.555 vs $1.28 per million).

Shared results
36
Mistral Small 3.1 24B only
2
Qwen3.7 Plus only
39
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Small 3.1 24B not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 33.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: Mistral Small 3.1 24B 1253 against Qwen3.7 Plus 1509, 42.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.555 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Mistral Small 3.1 24B takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Small 3.1 24BBarsQwen3.7 PlusTies
Coding02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General023
All shared boards036
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured55.9Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured46.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured52.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured54.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCodeNot measured46.1%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierCodeNot measured10.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: coding13091473Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT13011473Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured25.2Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured147.0Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured17.5Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured38.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured10.5%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured16.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured49.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured2.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.6%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12781460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: expert12571466Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12901460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: diagrams11191292Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: homework11581295Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured34.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: math12611467Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: mathematical work12711470Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: science12651464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12671464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government12711451Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: business and finance12571435Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1269Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1261Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1262Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1276Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1239Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1269Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1208Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1143Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index023
General benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured53.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBenchNot measured78.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured73.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
DTBenchNot measured84.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMCANot measured37.6%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text12771454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following12631439Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing12521438Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision11361278Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: English12951458Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English12551445Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese12531509Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: German12661471Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Japanese12081412Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Korean12071413Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: French12731472Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Spanish12841457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Russian12631457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Polish12421449Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: multi-turn12701459Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries12991454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: writing and language12681437Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12501422Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: English11571280Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: Chinese11551332Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: reading text11321288Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: humor11421261Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: captioning1153Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1155Not measuredOnly Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing11231258Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena DocumentNot measured1444Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.0006Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.076Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen3.7 Plus
SpecificationMistral Small 3.1 24BQwen3.7 Plus
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 17, 2025June 3, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.351$0.32
Output $/Mtok$0.555$1.28
Coding indexNot benchmarked33.2
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Small 3.1 24B better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Small 3.1 24B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Small 3.1 24B for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.555 vs $1.28 per million).

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 per million input tokens and $0.555 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Small 3.1 24B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next