Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads Mistral Medium 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.9 to 9.0, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 13.6x less per output token ($0.147 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA
Coding
22.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.147
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

Mistral Medium 3 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has a coding score, 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
4
Mistral Medium 3 only
53
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning only
16
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3 not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 22.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 29.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Mistral Medium 3 31.3% against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 60.3%, 29.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3 $2.00 against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning $0.147 per million output tokens, 13.6x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3 takes 131K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3BarsNemotron 3.5 LightningTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
General01
All shared boards04
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured26.8Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured52.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured3.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured10.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured29.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
SciCodeNot measured32.1%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured769.2Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
LMArena Text: coding1385Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1385Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.012.9Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Epoch Capabilities Index134.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured3.5Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured2.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
τ²-Bench Telecom24.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)57.8%74.3%Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.1%10.6%Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Text: hard prompts1364Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: expert1342Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1374Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1155Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1165Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Math Index30.3Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)30.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: math1353Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1354Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured54.2%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: science1381Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1381Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1352Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
Design Arena: websites1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1024Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1018Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1034Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1084Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1069Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
IFBench39.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)31.3%60.3%Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
DTBench62.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text1370Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1338Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1343Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision1157Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: English1385Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1353Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1374Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: German1377Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1316Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1304Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: French1368Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1364Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1359Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1371Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1384Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1360Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1352Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1335Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: English1172Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1161Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1154Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1145Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1094Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1141Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1146Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3$0.0014Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0001Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3$0.026Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0031Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3$0.100Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.012Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
SpecificationMistral Medium 3NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
MakerMistral AINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 7, 2025August 11, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.0534
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.147
Coding indexNot benchmarked22.6
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.06
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3 better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning for coding?

Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has a coding score, 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs $0.0534 and $0.147. Cost per solved task is known for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Medium 3's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next