Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Step 5 Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 34 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
9.2
Output $/M
$2.00
3
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
43.7
Output $/M
$2.70
31
vs boards won of 34 shared

Decision reading

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge where output tokens cost 1.4x less, and where what matters is LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: legal and government, where it leads.

Shared results
34
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
40
Step 5 Preview only
27
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 34.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Mistral Medium 3.1 42.7% against Step 5 Preview 88.3%, 45.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.1 takes 131K tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.1BarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge22
General117
All shared boards331
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1567Only Step 5 Preview measured
AA Coding Index20.5Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)44.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SciCode32.4%58.9%Step 5 Preview
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)10.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
ALE-Bench210.2Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding14331485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14361473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1556Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.243.7Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index1.9Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom40.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)63.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%46.5%Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts14261461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert14081485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams11751308Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: homework11651265Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
AIME42.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)87.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math Index38.3Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)38.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: math14081458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14121460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro75.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)68.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: science14441454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14491439Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14391437Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14181435Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1133Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: UI components1099Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev1074Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz1144Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1081Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1120Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG993Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art997Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index117
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IFBench39.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)42.7%88.3%Step 5 Preview
DTBench67.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMCA19.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text14241440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13981438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing13911409Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision11721265Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: English14381447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English14081428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14471500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: German1432Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese13791383Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Korean1380Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: French14601438Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Spanish14331441Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Russian14111433Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14181437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries14061449Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13951425Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13901412Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: English11791290Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: Chinese1190Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text11751282Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: humor1168Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1145Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1147Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1200Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Step 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.1 and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.1StepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerMistral AIStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 13, 2025October 8, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$1.00
Output $/Mtok$2.00$2.70
Coding indexNot benchmarked61.1
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge where output tokens cost 1.4x less, and where what matters is LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare or LMArena Text: legal and government, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Step 5 Preview?

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next