Mistral Large vs o3 Mini
o3 Mini leads Mistral Large on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.5 to 5.8, and o3 Mini costs 1.4x less per output token ($4.40 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 43 benchmarks have a result for both.
Mistral Large or o3 Mini: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Mistral Large for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 43
- Mistral Large only
- 1
- o3 Mini only
- 28
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
o3 Mini
o3 Mini leads, 12.5 against 5.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
o3 Mini
o3 Mini leads, 75.5% against 47.7%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
o3 Mini
o3 Mini leads, 86.5% against 9.2%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
o3 Mini
o3 Mini leads, 78.7% against 69.7%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
o3 Mini
o3 Mini takes 200K tokens against 128K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
o3 Mini
Mistral Large $0.0050, o3 Mini $0.0033 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Mistral Large not benchmarked, o3 Mini not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Coding, 30.5 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- AIME: Mistral Large 9.2% against o3 Mini 86.5%, 77.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Mistral Large $6.00 against o3 Mini $4.40 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
- Context window
- Mistral Large takes 128K tokens, o3 Mini 200K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Mistral Large | Bars | o3 Mini | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 4 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 6 | ||
| Math | 0 | 5 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 8 | ||
| General | 0 | 18 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 43 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
| Benchmark | Mistral Large | o3 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | Not measured | 60.4% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 42.4% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| SWE-bench Lite | Not measured | 32.3% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 37.1% | 71.5% | o3 Mini |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 17.8% | 73.4% | o3 Mini |
| SciCode | Not measured | 42.8% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 6.8% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 1.3% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 43.7% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Cybench | Not measured | 22.5% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1275 | 1378 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1274 | 1364 | o3 Mini |
| SciCode | Not measured | 7.7% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Mistral Large | o3 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 5.8 | 12.5 | o3 Mini |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.1 | 140.2 | o3 Mini |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Large | o3 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 31.3% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | Mistral Large | o3 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.7% | 75.5% | o3 Mini |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 35.1% | 77.3% | o3 Mini |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.5% | 12.0% | o3 Mini |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 77.0% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 34.5% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 3.0% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 22.8% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 15.0% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 7.0% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1257 | 1365 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1208 | 1364 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1268 | 1375 | o3 Mini |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Mistral Large | o3 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 9.2% | 86.5% | o3 Mini |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 74.4% | 91.8% | o3 Mini |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 87.2% | 91.3% | o3 Mini |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 76.9% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 18.6% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 0.0% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| MATH level 5 | Not measured | 96.5% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1261 | 1396 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1257 | 1399 | o3 Mini |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
| Benchmark | Mistral Large | o3 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 69.7% | 78.7% | o3 Mini |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.5% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.3% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 63.8% | 69.4% | o3 Mini |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 76.2% | 94.8% | o3 Mini |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 51.5% | 80.2% | o3 Mini |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 15.3% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| MMLU | 68.8% | Not measured | Only Mistral Large measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1260 | 1339 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1255 | 1330 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1275 | 1328 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1238 | 1313 | o3 Mini |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Large | o3 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
| Benchmark | Mistral Large | o3 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | Not measured | 67.1% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 43.0% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| DTBench | 60.8% | 68.8% | o3 Mini |
| LMCA | Not measured | 19.0% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 50.0% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | Not measured | 61.7% | Only o3 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text | 1265 | 1337 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1249 | 1337 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1242 | 1286 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: English | 1284 | 1351 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1235 | 1319 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1239 | 1379 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: German | 1242 | 1303 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1170 | 1286 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1202 | 1313 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: French | 1325 | 1334 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1268 | 1321 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1252 | 1304 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1157 | 1294 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1260 | 1320 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1261 | 1343 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1261 | 1313 | o3 Mini |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1230 | 1283 | o3 Mini |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Large | o3 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
o3 Mini costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
o3 Mini costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
o3 Mini costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Mistral Large | OpenAI o3 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Mistral AI | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | February 26, 2024 | January 31, 2025 |
| Context window | 128K | 200K |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.00 | $1.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $6.00 | $4.40 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Mistral Large better than o3 Mini for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Large for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Large or o3 Mini?
Mistral Large costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; o3 Mini costs $1.10 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Large or o3 Mini?
o3 Mini, with 200K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks is the Mistral Large vs o3 Mini comparison based on?
43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Large's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and o3 Mini's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.