Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 leads Ministral 3 14B 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.8 to 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs 1.7x less per output token ($0.20 vs $0.336 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Ministral 3 14B 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
0
MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
Coding
50.0
Overall
50.7
Output $/M
$0.336
7
vs boards won of 7 shared

Ministral 3 14B 2512 or MiMo-V2.5: which to pick

Only MiMo-V2.5 has a coding score, 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Ministral 3 14B 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.336 per million).

Shared results
7
Ministral 3 14B 2512 only
0
MiMo-V2.5 only
73
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ministral 3 14B 2512 not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.5 50.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 42.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Ministral 3 14B 2512 14.4 against MiMo-V2.5 56.8, 42.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Ministral 3 14B 2512 $0.20 against MiMo-V2.5 $0.336 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Ministral 3 14B 2512 takes 262K tokens, MiMo-V2.5 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMinistral 3 14B 2512BarsMiMo-V2.5Ties
Coding01
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Web design04
All shared boards07
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512MiMo-V2.5Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1438Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
AA Coding Index14.456.8MiMo-V2.5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.5%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured42.2%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured14.2%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured60.7%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured43.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured41.7%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured514.0Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1469Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1425Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1429Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512MiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.021.8MiMo-V2.5
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512MiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Agentic Index1.115.8MiMo-V2.5
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured36.7%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured9.1%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured90.6%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512MiMo-V2.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured81.6%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured80.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured27.2%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1450Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1459Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1461Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1269Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1262Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512MiMo-V2.5Leader
ProofBenchNot measured16.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1436Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1451Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512MiMo-V2.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured82.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured78.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured31.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1440Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1432Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1425Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1432Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Web design benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512MiMo-V2.5Leader
Design Arena: websites10811266MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1255Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev10371249MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1250Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D9891215MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: all code categories10641260MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1180Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1140Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index29 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512MiMo-V2.5Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured52.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured67.1%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured73.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1428Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1435Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1393Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1447Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1405Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1469Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1421Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1306Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1361Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1448Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1414Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1396Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1413Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1445Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1445Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1409Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1399Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1259Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1326Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1256Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1226Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1189Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1230Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Ministral 3 14B 2512 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkMinistral 3 14B 2512MiMo-V2.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.0003Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.0003Fits in one request

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.011Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.0094Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.042Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.037Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ministral 3 14B 2512 and MiMo-V2.5
SpecificationMistral Ministral 3 14B 2512Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5
MakerMistral AIXiaomi
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.168
Output $/Mtok$0.20$0.336
Coding indexNot benchmarked50.0
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.01
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ministral 3 14B 2512 better than MiMo-V2.5 for coding?

Only MiMo-V2.5 has a coding score, 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Ministral 3 14B 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.336 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or MiMo-V2.5?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.168 and $0.336. Cost per solved task is known for MiMo-V2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs MiMo-V2.5 comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Ministral 3 14B 2512's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next