Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads MiniMax M1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 37.9 to 11.7, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 7.9x less per output token ($0.28 vs $2.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
0
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Coding
54.7
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$0.28
29
vs boards won of 29 shared

MiniMax M1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which to pick

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a coding score, 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
29
MiniMax M1 only
0
MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
37
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M1 not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 54.7 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 26.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: MiniMax M1 1317 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1496, 29.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M1 $2.20 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 7.9x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M1 takes 1M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M1BarsMiMo-V2.6-FlashTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards029
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M1MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1634Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured24.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured76.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured51.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1244.2Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding13591499MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT13591497MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1648Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1641Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1596Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M1MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.737.9MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M1MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured56.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured31.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M1MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13391475MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: expert13171496MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13531493MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1276Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1283Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M1MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
ProofBenchNot measured63.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: math13611476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work13631478MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M1MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: science13541462MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13551439MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government13371441MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance13191454MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M1MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M1MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured54.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured74.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text13431453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following13121452MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing12971403MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1256Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: English13631476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: non-English13191431MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese13601509MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: German13501458MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese12171359MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Korean12661425MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: French13701480MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish13531453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Russian13291409MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Polish13291455MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn13351447MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries13261459MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language13111424MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13031415MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1269Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1231Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkMiniMax M1MiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0078Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.031Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SpecificationMiniMax M1Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MakerMiniMaxXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025September 21, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.14
Output $/Mtok$2.20$0.28
Coding indexNot benchmarked54.7
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M1 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a coding score, 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next