LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Wonder vs Hy3 preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 28 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace Muse Wonder Replace Hy3 preview
Muse WonderMeta
Coding
64.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
28
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
22.4
Overall
25.3
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 28 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 64.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.4 for Hy3 preview.

Pick Hy3 preview when output tokens cost 33.3x less.

Model AMuse WonderMeta64.5/1001 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BHy3 previewTencent22.4/1001 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
28
Muse Wonder only
32
Hy3 preview only
8
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Wonder 64.5 from 1 benchmark, Hy3 preview 22.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 31.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: Muse Wonder 1652 against Hy3 preview 1357, 42.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Wonder $20.00 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 33.3x apart.
Context window
Muse Wonder takes 1.05M tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse WonderBarsHy3 previewTies
Coding50
Reasoning40
Math20
Knowledge40
General130
All shared boards280
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderHy3 previewLeader
LMArena WebDev16521357Muse Wonder
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.8Only Hy3 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Code migration (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
IOI (Vals AI)66.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
SciCode60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.1%Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: coding15221421Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT15151423Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: React16411349Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: HTML16941356Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderHy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured25.3Only Hy3 preview measured
Epoch Capabilities Index161.8Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderHy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured24.1Only Hy3 preview measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1236Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)50.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)23.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)67.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)22.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science Index39.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured92.7%Only Hy3 preview measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,432Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderHy3 previewLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)27.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.7%Only Hy3 preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)50.1%27.8%Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts15061413Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert15131422Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15061416Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderHy3 previewLeader
ProofBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: math14861424Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: mathematical work15141442Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderHy3 previewLeader
LMArena Text: science15061416Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15121405Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government15051430Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance14831397Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderHy3 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1361Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: UI components1371Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: game dev1380Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: data viz1330Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: 3D1425Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: all code categories1370Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index130
General benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderHy3 previewLeader
Vals Index64.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)70.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
IFBenchNot measured63.1%Only Hy3 preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.7%64.7%Muse Wonder
DTBench95.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMCA56.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text15021401Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following14911383Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing14911339Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: English15071409Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English14921390Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese15371435Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: French15231425Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian15221399Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: multi-turn15101411Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries14931402Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: writing and language14961370Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14821352Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderHy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Wonder and Hy3 preview
SpecificationMeta Muse WonderTencent Hy3 preview
MakerMetaTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 12, 2026April 22, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$4.00$0.18
Output $/Mtok$20.00$0.60
Coding index64.522.4
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Wonder better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 64.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.4 for Hy3 preview. Pick Hy3 preview when output tokens cost 33.3x less.

Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or Hy3 preview?

Muse Wonder costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Wonder or Hy3 preview?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Wonder vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Wonder's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next