Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Wonder vs Extract

Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Muse WonderMeta
Coding
71.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
S ExtractScaledown
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
vs 1.05M vs 1M context window. About the same size.

Muse Wonder or Extract: which to pick

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Extract has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Muse Wonder has results on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI); Extract has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks, Extract not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Muse Wonder $20.00 against Extract Free per million output tokens.
Context window
Muse Wonder takes 1.05M tokens, Extract 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Extract
BenchmarkMuse WonderExtractLeader
LMArena WebDev1652Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Code migration (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
IOI (Vals AI)66.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
SciCode60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: coding1522Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1515Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: React1641Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1694Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Extract
BenchmarkMuse WonderExtractLeader
Epoch Capabilities Index161.8Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Extract
BenchmarkMuse WonderExtractLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1227Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)50.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)23.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)67.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)22.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science Index39.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,432Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Extract
BenchmarkMuse WonderExtractLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)27.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)50.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: expert1513Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Extract
BenchmarkMuse WonderExtractLeader
ProofBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: math1486Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1514Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Extract
BenchmarkMuse WonderExtractLeader
LMArena Text: science1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1512Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1505Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1483Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Extract
BenchmarkMuse WonderExtractLeader
Design Arena: websites1362Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: UI components1374Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: game dev1377Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: data viz1321Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: 3D1426Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: all code categories1371Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards measured
General benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Extract
BenchmarkMuse WonderExtractLeader
Vals Index64.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)70.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
DTBench95.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMCA56.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text1502Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1491Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1491Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: English1507Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: non-English1492Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1537Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: French1523Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: Russian1522Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1510Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1493Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1496Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1482Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request
Extract$0.0000Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request
Extract$0.0020Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request
Extract$0.0080Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Wonder and Extract
SpecificationMeta Muse WonderScaleDown Extract
MakerMetaScaledown
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 12, 2026October 13, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$4.00$0.04
Output $/Mtok$20.00Free
Coding index71.9Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Wonder better than Extract for coding?

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Extract has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or Extract?

Muse Wonder costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Extract costs $0.04 and Free. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Wonder or Extract?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

Has any benchmark tested both Muse Wonder and Extract?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Muse Wonder has results on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI); Extract has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next