Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Wonder vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs 18.2x less per output token than Muse Wonder ($1.10 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse WonderMeta
Coding
71.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
25
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
0
vs boards won of 25 shared

Muse Wonder or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct: which to pick

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for output tokens 18.2x cheaper ($1.10 vs $20.00 per million).

Shared results
25
Muse Wonder only
35
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct only
16
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 19.7 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Muse Wonder 50.1% against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 12.6%, 37.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Wonder $20.00 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct $1.10 per million output tokens, 18.2x apart.
Context window
Muse Wonder takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse WonderBarsQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructTies
Coding20
Reasoning40
Math20
Knowledge40
General130
All shared boards250
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
LMArena WebDev1652Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Code migration (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
IOI (Vals AI)66.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.4%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
SciCode60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured9.8%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding15221440Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT15151447Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: React1641Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1694Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured9.6Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities Index161.8Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1243Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)50.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)23.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)67.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)22.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science Index39.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured41.5%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,432Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)27.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured75.9%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)50.1%12.6%Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts15061428Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert15131417Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15061431Muse Wonder
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured66.7%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured84.3Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.3%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
ProofBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: math14861440Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: mathematical work15141434Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science15061434Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15121455Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government15051431Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance14831422Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1362Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: UI components1379Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: game dev1376Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: data viz1317Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: 3D1427Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: all code categories1371Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index130
General benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
Vals Index64.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)70.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
IFBenchNot measured60.7%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.7%63.7%Muse Wonder
DTBench95.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMCA56.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured55.6%Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text15021417Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following14911388Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing14911333Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: English15071421Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English14921407Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese15371460Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1416Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1395Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1363Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: French15231414Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1435Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian15221404Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1398Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15101416Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries14931402Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: writing and language14961355Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14821349Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.0083Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.031Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
SpecificationMeta Muse WonderQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 12, 2026September 11, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$4.00$0.10
Output $/Mtok$20.00$1.10
Coding index71.9Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Wonder better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for coding?

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for output tokens 18.2x cheaper ($1.10 vs $20.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?

Muse Wonder costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs $0.10 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Wonder or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Wonder vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Wonder's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next