LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Wonder vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

Updated October 21, 2026. 5 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Muse WonderMeta
Coding
64.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
5
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
60.4
Overall
9.6
Output $/M
$0.28
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

Decision reading

Muse Wonder scores 64.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 60.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick Muse Wonder when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens, or when what matters is Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) or Design Arena: websites, where it leads; pick Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct when output tokens cost 71.4x less.

Shared results
5
Muse Wonder only
55
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct only
11
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Wonder 64.5 from 1 benchmark, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 60.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
General, 48.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Muse Wonder 80.7% against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 32.7%, 48.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Wonder $20.00 against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct $0.28 per million output tokens, 71.4x apart.
Context window
Muse Wonder takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse WonderBarsQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructTies
Reasoning10
Web design30
General10
All shared boards50
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index17 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured60.4%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured49.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena WebDev1652Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Code migration (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
IOI (Vals AI)66.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.3%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SciCode60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding1522Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1515Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: React1641Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1694Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured9.6Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities Index161.8Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1236Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)50.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)23.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)67.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)22.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science Index39.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured34.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,432Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)27.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured51.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)50.1%3.8%Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: expert1513Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured29.0Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.0%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
ProofBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: math1486Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1514Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1512Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1505Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1483Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Web design benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites13611087Muse Wonder
Design Arena: UI components13711046Muse Wonder
Design Arena: game dev1380Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: data viz13301085Muse Wonder
Design Arena: 3D1425Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: all code categories1370Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Vals Index64.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)70.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
IFBenchNot measured32.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.7%32.7%Muse Wonder
DTBench95.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMCA56.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text1502Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1491Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1491Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: English1507Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: non-English1492Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1537Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: French1523Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: Russian1522Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1510Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1493Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1496Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1482Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse WonderQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0043Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.017Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Wonder and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
SpecificationMeta Muse WonderQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 12, 2026July 31, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$4.00$0.07
Output $/Mtok$20.00$0.28
Coding index64.560.4
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Wonder better than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for coding?

Muse Wonder scores 64.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 60.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick Muse Wonder when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens, or when what matters is Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) or Design Arena: websites, where it leads; pick Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct when output tokens cost 71.4x less.

Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

Muse Wonder costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.07 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Wonder or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Wonder vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Wonder's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next