Muse Wonder vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 40.0x less per output token than Muse Wonder ($0.50 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.
Muse Wonder or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick
Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 40.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $20.00 per million).
- Shared results
- 8
- Muse Wonder only
- 52
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
- 8
- Like-for-like categories
- 4 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has a AA Intelligence Index result, 26.5.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder leads, 1363 against 1173.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Muse Wonder has a Vals Index result, 64.9%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1.05M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Muse Wonder $0.014, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Web design, 30.2 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Design Arena: 3D: Muse Wonder 1428 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1128, 37.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Muse Wonder $20.00 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 40.0x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1.05M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Bars | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 5 | 0 | ||
| General | 1 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 8 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 65.5% | Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1652 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 49.5% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 83.1% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 62.5% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 66.9% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 45.6% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 26.6% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 80.4% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| SciCode | 60.3% | 47.8% | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1522 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1515 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1641 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1694 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 26.5 | Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 161.8 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1258 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 70.9% | Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 4.0% | Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 15.8% | Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 56.6% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 36.3% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 50.5% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 23.8% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 67.1% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 22.9% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Vals Science Index | 39.1% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | 7.2% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $9,432 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 78.8% | Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 27.5% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 50.1% | 30.7% | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1506 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1513 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1506 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 84.0% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1486 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1514 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text: science | 1506 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1512 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1505 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1483 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1363 | 1173 | Muse Wonder |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1380 | 1149 | Muse Wonder |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1379 | 1110 | Muse Wonder |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1312 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1428 | 1128 | Muse Wonder |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1372 | 1154 | Muse Wonder |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 60.7% | Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 64.9% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 64.6% | Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 70.2% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 80.7% | 69.0% | Muse Wonder |
| DTBench | 95.2% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMCA | 56.8% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text | 1502 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1491 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1491 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1507 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1492 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1537 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1523 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1522 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1510 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1493 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1496 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1482 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Meta Muse Wonder | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | October 12, 2026 | October 15, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $4.00 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $20.00 | $0.50 |
| Coding index | 71.9 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Muse Wonder better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?
Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 40.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $20.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
Muse Wonder costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Muse Wonder or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Muse Wonder vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?
8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Wonder's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.