Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Wonder vs Moondream 3 Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Muse WonderMeta
Coding
71.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
M Moondream 3 PreviewMoondream
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $20.00 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. Moondream 3 Preview is 8.0x cheaper.

Decision reading

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Moondream 3 Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Moondream 3 Preview has the edge where output tokens cost 8.0x less.

Shared results
0
Muse Wonder only
60
Moondream 3 Preview only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks, Moondream 3 Preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Muse Wonder $20.00 against Moondream 3 Preview $2.50 per million output tokens, 8.0x apart.
Context window
Muse Wonder takes 1.05M tokens, Moondream 3 Preview 32K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
LMArena WebDev1652Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Code migration (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
IOI (Vals AI)66.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
SciCode60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: coding1522Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1515Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: React1641Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1694Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
Epoch Capabilities Index161.8Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1232Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)50.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)23.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)67.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)22.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science Index39.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,432Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)27.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)50.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: expert1513Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
ProofBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: math1486Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1514Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
LMArena Text: science1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1512Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1505Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1483Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1361Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: UI components1374Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: game dev1379Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: data viz1321Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: 3D1425Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: all code categories1370Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
Vals Index64.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)70.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
DTBench95.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMCA56.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text1502Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1491Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1491Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: English1507Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: non-English1492Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1537Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: French1523Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: Russian1522Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1510Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1493Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1496Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1482Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkMuse WonderMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.0015Fits in one request

Moondream 3 Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.022Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3 Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.085Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3 Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Wonder and Moondream 3 Preview
SpecificationMeta Muse WonderMoondream 3 Preview
MakerMetaMoondream
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 12, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1.05M32K
Input $/Mtok$4.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$20.00$2.50
Coding index71.9Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Wonder better than Moondream 3 Preview for coding?

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Moondream 3 Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Moondream 3 Preview has the edge where output tokens cost 8.0x less.

Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or Moondream 3 Preview?

Muse Wonder costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Moondream 3 Preview costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Wonder or Moondream 3 Preview?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 32K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Wonder vs Moondream 3 Preview comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Wonder's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Moondream 3 Preview's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next