Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Wonder vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs 36.0x less per output token than Muse Wonder ($0.555 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse WonderMeta
Coding
71.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
23
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.555
0
vs boards won of 23 shared

Muse Wonder or Mistral Small 3.1 24B: which to pick

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Small 3.1 24B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Small 3.1 24B for output tokens 36.0x cheaper ($0.555 vs $20.00 per million).

Shared results
23
Muse Wonder only
37
Mistral Small 3.1 24B only
15
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks, Mistral Small 3.1 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 39.4 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: Muse Wonder 1537 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B 1253, 47.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Wonder $20.00 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.555 per million output tokens, 36.0x apart.
Context window
Muse Wonder takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse WonderBarsMistral Small 3.1 24BTies
Coding20
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General120
All shared boards230
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LMArena WebDev1652Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Code migration (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
IOI (Vals AI)66.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
SciCode60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: coding15221309Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT15151301Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: React1641Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1694Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Epoch Capabilities Index161.8Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1243Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)50.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)23.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)67.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)22.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science Index39.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,432Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)27.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)50.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15061278Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert15131257Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15061290Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1119Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1158Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
ProofBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: math14861261Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: mathematical work15141271Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LMArena Text: science15061265Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15121267Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government15051271Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance14831257Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Design Arena: websites1362Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: UI components1379Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: game dev1376Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: data viz1317Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: 3D1427Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: all code categories1371Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
General benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Vals Index64.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)70.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
DTBench95.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMCA56.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text15021277Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following14911263Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing14911252Muse Wonder
LMArena VisionNot measured1136Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: English15071295Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English14921255Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese15371253Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1266Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1208Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1207Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: French15231273Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1284Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: Russian15221263Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1242Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15101270Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries14931299Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: writing and language14961268Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14821250Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1157Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1155Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1132Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1142Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1153Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1155Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1123Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.0006Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.019Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.076Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Wonder and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
SpecificationMeta Muse WonderMistral Small 3.1 24B
MakerMetaMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 12, 2026March 17, 2025
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$4.00$0.351
Output $/Mtok$20.00$0.555
Coding index71.9Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Wonder better than Mistral Small 3.1 24B for coding?

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Small 3.1 24B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Small 3.1 24B for output tokens 36.0x cheaper ($0.555 vs $20.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Muse Wonder costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 and $0.555. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Wonder or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Wonder vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Wonder's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3.1 24B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next