Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Wonder vs Mistral Large 2407

Mistral Large 2407 costs 3.3x less per output token than Muse Wonder ($6.00 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse WonderMeta
Coding
71.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
3
Mistral Large 2407Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

Muse Wonder or Mistral Large 2407: which to pick

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large 2407 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Large 2407 for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($6.00 vs $20.00 per million).

Shared results
3
Muse Wonder only
57
Mistral Large 2407 only
14
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks, Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 56.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Muse Wonder 80.7% against Mistral Large 2407 2.0%, 78.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Wonder $20.00 against Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Muse Wonder takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Large 2407 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse WonderBarsMistral Large 2407Ties
Reasoning10
General20
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Large 2407Leader
LMArena WebDev1652Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Code migration (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
IOI (Vals AI)66.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)26.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured26.7%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
SciCode60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: coding1522Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1515Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: React1641Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1694Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Large 2407Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured7.6Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index161.8Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Large 2407Leader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1227Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)50.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)23.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)67.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)22.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science Index39.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Vending-Bench 2$9,432Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Large 2407Leader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)27.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.2%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)50.1%2.9%Muse Wonder
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured49.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured22.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: expert1513Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Large 2407Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured0.0Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured8.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
ProofBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
MATH level 5Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: math1486Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1514Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Large 2407Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.3%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
MMLUNot measured80.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: science1506Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1512Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1505Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1483Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Large 2407Leader
Design Arena: websites1362Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: UI components1374Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: game dev1377Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: data viz1321Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: 3D1426Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: all code categories1371Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Large 2407Leader
Vals Index64.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)70.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
IFBenchNot measured31.6%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.7%2.0%Muse Wonder
DTBench95.2%61.2%Muse Wonder
LMCA56.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured69.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text1502Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1491Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1491Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: English1507Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: non-English1492Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1537Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: French1523Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: Russian1522Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1510Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1493Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1496Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1482Not measuredOnly Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Wonder and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkMuse WonderMistral Large 2407Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.0050Fits in one request

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.118Fits in one request

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.460Exceeds the context window

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Wonder and Mistral Large 2407
SpecificationMeta Muse WonderMistral Large 2407
MakerMetaMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 12, 2026November 19, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$4.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$20.00$6.00
Coding index71.9Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Wonder better than Mistral Large 2407 for coding?

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large 2407 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Large 2407 for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($6.00 vs $20.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or Mistral Large 2407?

Muse Wonder costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Wonder or Mistral Large 2407?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Wonder vs Mistral Large 2407 comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Wonder's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 2407's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next