Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark Open vs Mistral Nemo

Updated October 21, 2026. 1 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.25
1
Mistral NemoMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Decision reading

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Nemo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Mistral Nemo has the edge where output tokens cost 28.3x less.

Shared results
1
Muse Spark Open only
25
Mistral Nemo only
2
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks, Mistral Nemo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 45.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Epoch Capabilities Index: Muse Spark Open 155.1 against Mistral Nemo 118.7, 45.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark Open $4.25 against Mistral Nemo $0.15 per million output tokens, 28.3x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark Open takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Nemo 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark OpenBarsMistral NemoTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMistral NemoLeader
LiveBench coding73.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev1528Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
SciCode58.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
ALE-Bench1590.1Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: React1529Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1495Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMistral NemoLeader
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1118.7Muse Spark Open
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMistral NemoLeader
LiveBench research80.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browser36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agentic18.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)61.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)53.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
APEX-Agents33.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMistral NemoLeader
LiveBench reasoning73.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMistral NemoLeader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMistral NemoLeader
MMLUNot measured65.3%Only Mistral Nemo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMistral NemoLeader
Design Arena: websites1313Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game dev1303Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench design60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMistral NemoLeader
LiveBench data analysis60.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
DTBenchNot measured48.6%Only Mistral Nemo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Mistral Nemo
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenMistral NemoLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request
Mistral Nemo$0.0002Fits in one request

Mistral Nemo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request
Mistral Nemo$0.0080Fits in one request

Mistral Nemo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request
Mistral Nemo$0.032Exceeds the context window

Mistral Nemo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark Open and Mistral Nemo
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark OpenMistral Nemo
MakerMetaMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026July 19, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.15
Output $/Mtok$4.25$0.15
Coding index47.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark Open better than Mistral Nemo for coding?

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Nemo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Mistral Nemo has the edge where output tokens cost 28.3x less.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark Open or Mistral Nemo?

Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Mistral Nemo costs $0.15 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark Open or Mistral Nemo?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark Open vs Mistral Nemo comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Spark Open's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Mistral Nemo's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next