Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Nemotron 3 Ultra leads Muse Glimmer 30B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.9 to 17.5, and Muse Glimmer 30B costs 1.8x less per output token ($1.35 vs $2.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Glimmer 30BMeta
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.35
0
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.40
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

Muse Glimmer 30B or Nemotron 3 Ultra: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Muse Glimmer 30B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($1.35 vs $2.40 per million).

Shared results
4
Muse Glimmer 30B only
1
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
67
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Glimmer 30B not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 11.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Agentic Index: Muse Glimmer 30B 8.5 against Nemotron 3 Ultra 20.1, 11.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Glimmer 30B $1.35 against Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
Muse Glimmer 30B takes 131K tokens, Nemotron 3 Ultra 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Glimmer 30BBarsNemotron 3 UltraTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Web design01
All shared boards04
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Coding Index49.049.3Nemotron 3 Ultra
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SciCodeNot measured40.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured36.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
FrontierCodeNot measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
WeirdMLNot measured43.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ALE-Bench962.5Not measuredOnly Muse Glimmer 30B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Intelligence Index17.522.9Nemotron 3 Ultra
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.0Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Agentic Index8.520.1Nemotron 3 Ultra
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured83.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured22.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MCP AtlasNot measured63.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3 UltraLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured85.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured20.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1453Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3 UltraLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProofBenchNot measured2.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1457Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1461Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3 UltraLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1465Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1456Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1434Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3 UltraLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1145Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1135Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: game dev11321138Nemotron 3 Ultra
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1141Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1131Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1146Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1069Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1100Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3 UltraLeader
IFBenchNot measured81.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
DTBenchNot measured90.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMCANot measured36.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena TextNot measured1445Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1399Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1455Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1427Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1497Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1384Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1455Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1417Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1385Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1437Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1406Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Glimmer 30B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkMuse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3 UltraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.0010Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0018Fits in one request

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.020Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.037Fits in one request

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Glimmer 30B$0.079Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.144Fits in one request

Muse Glimmer 30B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Glimmer 30B and Nemotron 3 Ultra
SpecificationMeta Muse Glimmer 30BNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
MakerMetaNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 9, 2026June 4, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.325$0.60
Output $/Mtok$1.35$2.40
Coding indexNot benchmarked30.0
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Glimmer 30B better than Nemotron 3 Ultra for coding?

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Muse Glimmer 30B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Muse Glimmer 30B for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($1.35 vs $2.40 per million).

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.325 per million input tokens and $1.35 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Glimmer 30B or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Glimmer 30B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Ultra's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next