Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Schematron V2 Small vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Schematron V2 Small costs 5.6x less per output token than Qwen3.7 Plus ($0.23 vs $1.28 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Schematron V2 SmallInference.net
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.23
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
vs $0.23 vs $1.28 per 1M output tokens. Schematron V2 Small is 5.6x cheaper.

Schematron V2 Small or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Schematron V2 Small has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Schematron V2 Small for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($0.23 vs $1.28 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Schematron V2 Small has none yet; Qwen3.7 Plus on AA Coding Index, Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Schematron V2 Small not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Schematron V2 Small $0.23 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 5.6x apart.
Context window
Schematron V2 Small takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured55.9Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured46.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured52.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured54.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCodeNot measured46.1%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierCodeNot measured10.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1473Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1473Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured25.2Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured147.0Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured17.5Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured38.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured10.5%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured16.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured49.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured2.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen3.7 PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.6%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1460Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1466Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1460Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1292Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1295Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen3.7 PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured34.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1467Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1470Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen3.7 PlusLeader
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1464Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1464Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1451Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1269Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1261Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1262Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1276Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1239Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1269Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1208Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1143Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards measured
General benchmarks for Schematron V2 Small and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkSchematron V2 SmallQwen3.7 PlusLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured53.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBenchNot measured78.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured73.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
DTBenchNot measured84.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMCANot measured37.6%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena TextNot measured1454Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1439Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1438Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1278Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1458Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1445Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1509Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1471Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1412Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1413Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1472Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1457Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1449Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1459Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1454Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1437Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1422Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1280Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1332Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1288Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1261Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1258Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1444Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.0032Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Schematron V2 Small$0.012Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Schematron V2 Small and Qwen3.7 Plus
SpecificationInference.net Schematron V2 SmallQwen3.7 Plus
MakerInference.netQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 12, 2026June 3, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.32
Output $/Mtok$0.23$1.28
Coding indexNot benchmarked33.2
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Schematron V2 Small better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Schematron V2 Small has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Schematron V2 Small for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($0.23 vs $1.28 per million).

Which is cheaper, Schematron V2 Small or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Schematron V2 Small costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Schematron V2 Small or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Schematron V2 Small and Qwen3.7 Plus?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Schematron V2 Small has none yet; Qwen3.7 Plus on AA Coding Index, Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next