Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Ling 3.0 Flash leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.1 to 9.9, and Ling 3.0 Flash costs 15.6x less per output token ($0.1215 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Ling 3.0 FlashinclusionAI
Coding
29.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.1215
4
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Only Ling 3.0 Flash has a coding score, 29.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
4
Ling 3.0 Flash only
20
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
45
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ling 3.0 Flash 29.6 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 10.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Ling 3.0 Flash 23.7% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 11.9%, 11.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Ling 3.0 Flash $0.1215 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 15.6x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLing 3.0 FlashBarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards40
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Coding Index50.6Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)65.2%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)27.9%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
SciCode42.0%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured11.4%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1438Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1442Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.19.9Ling 3.0 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index19.3Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)30.3%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)25.0%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured54.1%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond84.8%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.5%77.2%Ling 3.0 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.7%11.9%Ling 3.0 Flash
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1428Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1442Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1439Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1425Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1419Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro82.0%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.9%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.7%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)32.3%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1445Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1431Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1438Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1433Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)50.7%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.9%Not measuredOnly Ling 3.0 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured56.5%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.0%63.7%Ling 3.0 Flash
LMArena TextNot measured1420Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1406Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1366Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1429Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1405Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1462Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1424Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1385Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1394Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1452Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1428Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1408Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1419Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1428Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1420Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1393Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1368Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkLing 3.0 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0024Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationinclusionAI Ling 3.0 FlashQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerinclusionAIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 23, 2026September 23, 2025
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.0405$0.21
Output $/Mtok$0.1215$1.90
Coding index29.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved task$0.05Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ling 3.0 Flash better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Only Ling 3.0 Flash has a coding score, 29.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.0405 per million input tokens and $0.1215 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for Ling 3.0 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Ling 3.0 Flash's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next