Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Ling 3.0 Flash VL leads Nemotron 3 Ultra on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.6 to 22.9, and Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs 13.3x less per output token ($0.18 vs $2.40 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Ling 3.0 Flash VLinclusionAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.18
4
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.40
3
vs boards won of 7 shared

Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Nemotron 3 Ultra: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Ling 3.0 Flash VL has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL for output tokens 13.3x cheaper ($0.18 vs $2.40 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.

Shared results
7
Ling 3.0 Flash VL only
0
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
64
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ling 3.0 Flash VL not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 8.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Agentic Index: Ling 3.0 Flash VL 28.7 against Nemotron 3 Ultra 20.1, 8.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Ling 3.0 Flash VL $0.18 against Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 per million output tokens, 13.3x apart.
Context window
Ling 3.0 Flash VL takes 131K tokens, Nemotron 3 Ultra 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLing 3.0 Flash VLBarsNemotron 3 UltraTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning02
General01
All shared boards43
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Coding Index57.049.3Ling 3.0 Flash VL
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SciCode44.2%40.3%Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured36.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
FrontierCodeNot measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
WeirdMLNot measured43.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1467Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.622.9Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.0Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Agentic Index28.720.1Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured83.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured22.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MCP AtlasNot measured63.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLNemotron 3 UltraLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%28.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured85.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured20.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1453Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLNemotron 3 UltraLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProofBenchNot measured2.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1457Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1462Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLNemotron 3 UltraLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1465Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1455Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1453Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLNemotron 3 UltraLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1145Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1135Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1138Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1142Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1132Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1146Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1069Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1100Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLNemotron 3 UltraLeader
IFBenchNot measured81.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%79.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra
DTBenchNot measured90.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMCANot measured36.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena TextNot measured1445Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1398Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1454Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1427Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1498Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1474Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1385Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1473Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1454Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1417Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1385Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1437Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1405Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkLing 3.0 Flash VLNemotron 3 UltraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash VL$0.0001Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0018Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash VL$0.0035Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.037Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash VL$0.014Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.144Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Nemotron 3 Ultra
SpecificationinclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash VLNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
MakerinclusionAINVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 10, 2026June 4, 2026
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.06$0.60
Output $/Mtok$0.18$2.40
Coding indexNot benchmarked30.0
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ling 3.0 Flash VL better than Nemotron 3 Ultra for coding?

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Ling 3.0 Flash VL has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL for output tokens 13.3x cheaper ($0.18 vs $2.40 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Nemotron 3 Ultra comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Ling 3.0 Flash VL's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Ultra's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next