Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads Mercury 2.5 on coding, 65.4 to 1.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Mercury 2.5 costs 5.8x less per output token ($0.15 vs $0.87 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 20 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mercury 2.5Inception
Coding
1.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
0
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
Coding
65.4
Overall
68.4
Output $/M
$0.87
20
vs boards won of 20 shared

Mercury 2.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro: which to pick

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding: it scores 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 1.6 for Mercury 2.5.

Pick Mercury 2.5 for output tokens 5.8x cheaper ($0.15 vs $0.87 per million).

Shared results
20
Mercury 2.5 only
2
MiMo-V2.6-Pro only
53
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mercury 2.5 1.6 from 2 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 65.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 67.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Mercury 2.5 3.7% against MiMo-V2.6-Pro 85.2%, 81.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mercury 2.5 $0.15 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.87 per million output tokens, 5.8x apart.
Context window
Mercury 2.5 takes 260K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMercury 2.5BarsMiMo-V2.6-ProTies
Coding08
Intelligence01
Agentic work05
Reasoning01
Math01
Knowledge01
General03
All shared boards020
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index08
Coding benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkMercury 2.5MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured81.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1625Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)0.0%31.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)3.7%85.2%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)4.5%43.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
IOI (Vals AI)2.4%39.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)34.5%67.8%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)18.1%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)45.5%72.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SciCode38.5%60.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ALE-Bench301.61158.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1533Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1528Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1639Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1616Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1598Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkMercury 2.5MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.346.3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Agentic work benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkMercury 2.5MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1290Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench researchNot measured76.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench browserNot measured88.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured47.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured3.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)18.9%57.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)2.5%32.4%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)4.3%47.1%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)8.8%62.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)0.0%2.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-AgentsNot measured54.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkMercury 2.5MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured79.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured15.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)11.8%49.4%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1511Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1541Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1520Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1281Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1264Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkMercury 2.5MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
ProofBench3.0%70.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1500Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1511Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkMercury 2.5MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)31.3%45.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1506Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1497Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1485Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1468Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkMercury 2.5MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1308Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1340Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1314Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1336Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1330Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1317Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
General benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkMercury 2.5MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Vals IndexNot measured57.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured72.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)45.3%68.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.1%88.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%86.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena TextNot measured1491Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1491Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1466Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1263Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1504Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1474Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1529Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1479Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1466Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1501Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1470Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1465Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkMercury 2.5MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mercury 2.5$0.0001Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.0009Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mercury 2.5$0.0024Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.024Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mercury 2.5$0.0095Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.096Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mercury 2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SpecificationInception Mercury 2.5Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MakerInceptionXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 8, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window260K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.04$0.435
Output $/Mtok$0.15$0.87
Coding index1.665.4
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mercury 2.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding: it scores 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 1.6 for Mercury 2.5. Pick Mercury 2.5 for output tokens 5.8x cheaper ($0.15 vs $0.87 per million).

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Mercury 2.5 costs $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 and $0.87. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 260K.

How many benchmarks is the Mercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison based on?

20 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mercury 2.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/inception-mercury-2-5-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-pro" title="Mercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/inception-mercury-2-5-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-pro">LLMBenchmark.ai, Mercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro</a></p>