Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads Granite 4.2 8B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.2 to 11.1, and Granite 4.2 8B costs 6.4x less per output token ($0.20 vs $1.28 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
0
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
27
vs boards won of 27 shared

Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Granite 4.2 8B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.28 per million).

Shared results
27
Granite 4.2 8B only
0
Qwen3.7 Plus only
48
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 25.5 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: creative writing: Granite 4.2 8B 1236 against Qwen3.7 Plus 1438, 33.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 6.4x apart.
Context window
Granite 4.2 8B takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGranite 4.2 8BBarsQwen3.7 PlusTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Knowledge04
General012
All shared boards027
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Coding Index22.455.9Qwen3.7 Plus
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured46.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured52.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured54.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCode31.5%46.1%Qwen3.7 Plus
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierCodeNot measured10.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: coding13781473Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT13671473Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.125.2Qwen3.7 Plus
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured147.0Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Agentic Index1.317.5Qwen3.7 Plus
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured38.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured10.5%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured16.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured49.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured2.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)63.1%90.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.7%35.6%Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13271460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: expert13861466Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13451460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1292Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1295Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured34.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1467Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1470Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: science13361464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13361464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government13271451Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: business and finance13221435Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1269Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1258Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1262Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1277Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1238Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1268Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1207Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1143Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured53.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBenchNot measured78.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)45.0%73.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
DTBenchNot measured84.0%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMCANot measured37.6%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text13191454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following13001439Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing12361438Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena VisionNot measured1278Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: English13371458Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English13011445Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese13671509Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1471Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1412Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1413Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1472Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Russian12821457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1449Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13011459Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries13251454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: writing and language12691437Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12711422Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1280Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1332Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1288Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1261Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1258Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1444Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen3.7 Plus
SpecificationIBM Granite 4.2 8BQwen3.7 Plus
MakerIBM GraniteQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 31, 2026June 3, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.08$0.32
Output $/Mtok$0.20$1.28
Coding indexNot benchmarked33.2
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Granite 4.2 8B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.28 per million).

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Granite 4.2 8B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next