Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Muse Wonder

Granite 4.0 Micro costs 178.6x less per output token than Muse Wonder ($0.112 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

Granite 4.0 MicroIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.112
0
Muse WonderMeta
Coding
71.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
2
vs boards won of 2 shared

Granite 4.0 Micro or Muse Wonder: which to pick

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Granite 4.0 Micro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Granite 4.0 Micro for output tokens 178.6x cheaper ($0.112 vs $20.00 per million).

Shared results
2
Granite 4.0 Micro only
11
Muse Wonder only
61
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Granite 4.0 Micro not benchmarked, Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 73.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Granite 4.0 Micro 7.0% against Muse Wonder 80.7%, 73.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Granite 4.0 Micro $0.112 against Muse Wonder $20.00 per million output tokens, 178.6x apart.
Context window
Granite 4.0 Micro takes 131K tokens, Muse Wonder 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGranite 4.0 MicroBarsMuse WonderTies
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards02
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMuse WonderLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1651Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured49.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured83.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured62.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured66.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured26.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Wonder measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)18.0%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
SciCodeNot measured60.3%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1518Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1514Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1647Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1676Only Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMuse WonderLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.1Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured161.8Only Muse Wonder measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMuse WonderLeader
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1127Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1105Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1259Only Muse Wonder measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured56.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.3%Only Muse Wonder measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured50.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured23.8%Only Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured22.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured39.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
τ²-Bench Telecom12.6%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$9,432Only Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMuse WonderLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured27.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)33.6%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.0%50.1%Muse Wonder
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)28.3%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1505Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1514Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1506Only Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMuse WonderLeader
AA Math Index6.0Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
OTIS Mock AIME2.8%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
ProofBenchNot measured84.0%Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1484Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1511Only Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMuse WonderLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)44.7%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1507Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1510Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1507Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1483Only Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMuse WonderLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1363Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1380Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1379Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1311Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1443Only Muse Wonder measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1375Only Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMuse WonderLeader
Vals IndexNot measured64.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
IFBench24.8%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)7.0%80.7%Muse Wonder
DTBenchNot measured95.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
LMCANot measured56.8%Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena TextNot measured1501Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1493Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1493Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1506Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1491Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1541Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1519Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1477Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1522Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1507Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1492Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1497Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1481Only Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMuse WonderLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Granite 4.0 Micro$0.0001Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request

Granite 4.0 Micro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Granite 4.0 Micro$0.0012Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request

Granite 4.0 Micro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Granite 4.0 Micro$0.0045Exceeds the context window
Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request

Granite 4.0 Micro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Granite 4.0 Micro and Muse Wonder
SpecificationIBM Granite 4.0 MicroMeta Muse Wonder
MakerIBM GraniteMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 20, 2025October 12, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.017$4.00
Output $/Mtok$0.112$20.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked71.9
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Muse Wonder for coding?

Only Muse Wonder has a coding score, 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; Granite 4.0 Micro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Granite 4.0 Micro for output tokens 178.6x cheaper ($0.112 vs $20.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Muse Wonder?

Granite 4.0 Micro costs $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.112 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Granite 4.0 Micro or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Granite 4.0 Micro vs Muse Wonder comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Granite 4.0 Micro's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Wonder's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next