Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok Build 0.1 vs o4 Mini

Updated October 21, 2026. 1 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Grok Build 0.1xAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.2
Output $/M
$2.00
1
o4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
16.7
Output $/M
$4.40
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Grok Build 0.1 has the edge where output tokens cost 2.2x less, and where the context window is larger, 256K against 200K tokens.

Shared results
1
Grok Build 0.1 only
2
o4 Mini only
93
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok Build 0.1 not benchmarked, o4 Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 10.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Grok Build 0.1 27.2 against o4 Mini 16.7, 10.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok Build 0.1 $2.00 against o4 Mini $4.40 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Grok Build 0.1 takes 256K tokens, o4 Mini 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok Build 0.1Barso4 MiniTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1o4 MiniLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured72.0%Only o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured64.6%Only o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured33.9%Only o4 Mini measured
AA Coding Index51.5Not measuredOnly Grok Build 0.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only o4 Mini measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)13.4%Not measuredOnly Grok Build 0.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.9%Only o4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.2%Only o4 Mini measured
GSO-BenchNot measured3.6%Only o4 Mini measured
WeirdMLNot measured52.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1368Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1367Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1o4 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index27.216.7Grok Build 0.1
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured145.5Only o4 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1o4 MiniLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured55.6%Only o4 Mini measured
METR time horizonsNot measured63.9%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1o4 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured74.5%Only o4 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.4%Only o4 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured16.5%Only o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured79.6%Only o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGINot measured58.7%Only o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured6.1%Only o4 Mini measured
SimpleBenchNot measured38.7%Only o4 Mini measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only o4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured5.0%Only o4 Mini measured
VPCTNot measured57.5%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1351Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1343Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1366Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1197Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1234Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1o4 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured83.7%Only o4 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.2%Only o4 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured93.4%Only o4 Mini measured
AA Math IndexNot measured90.7Only o4 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.7%Only o4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured81.7%Only o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured36.1%Only o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured4.9%Only o4 Mini measured
MATH level 5Not measured97.8%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1389Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1379Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1o4 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured80.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.2%Only o4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.0%Only o4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.0%Only o4 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured33.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.2%Only o4 Mini measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured19.6%Only o4 Mini measured
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1354Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1361Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1350Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1325Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1o4 MiniLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured985Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured983Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1003Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured990Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured854Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured976Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1o4 MiniLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only o4 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured69.1%Only o4 Mini measured
IFBenchNot measured68.7%Only o4 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured61.0%Only o4 Mini measured
DTBenchNot measured77.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LMCANot measured26.5%Only o4 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured77.8%Only o4 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured75.0%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena TextNot measured1353Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1320Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1294Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1194Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1367Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1337Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1354Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1336Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1308Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1312Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1364Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1346Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1334Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1358Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1350Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1315Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1316Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1308Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1200Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1218Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1197Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1199Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1204Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1218Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1166Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok Build 0.1 and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1o4 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok Build 0.1$0.0020Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request

Grok Build 0.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok Build 0.1$0.056Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.068Fits in one request

Grok Build 0.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok Build 0.1$0.220Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window

Grok Build 0.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok Build 0.1 and o4 Mini
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok Build 0.1OpenAI o4 Mini
MakerxAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 20, 2026April 16, 2025
Context window256K200K
Input $/Mtok$1.00$1.10
Output $/Mtok$2.00$4.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok Build 0.1 better than o4 Mini for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Grok Build 0.1 has the edge where output tokens cost 2.2x less, and where the context window is larger, 256K against 200K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or o4 Mini?

Grok Build 0.1 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; o4 Mini costs $1.10 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok Build 0.1 or o4 Mini?

Grok Build 0.1, with 256K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok Build 0.1 vs o4 Mini comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok Build 0.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and o4 Mini's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next