Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5 vs o3

GPT-5 leads o3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.0 to 20.2, and o3 costs 1.3x less per output token ($8.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 98 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5OpenAI
Coding
38.8
Overall
51.5
Output $/M
$10.00
78
o3OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
51.1
Output $/M
$8.00
20
vs boards won of 98 shared

GPT-5 or o3: which to pick

Only GPT-5 has a coding score, 38.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($8.00 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by GSO-Bench or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Shared results
98
GPT-5 only
15
o3 only
4
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5 38.8 from 3 benchmarks, o3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 15.8 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: GPT-5 55.4% against o3 33.3%, 22.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5 $10.00 against o3 $8.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-5 takes 400K tokens, o3 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5Barso3Ties
Coding83
Intelligence20
Agentic work50
Reasoning152
Math82
Knowledge114
Web design50
General249
All shared boards7820
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index83
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5 and o3
BenchmarkGPT-5o3Leader
Aider polyglot88.0%81.3%GPT-5
SWE-bench Verified74.4%58.4%GPT-5
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured36.0%Only o3 measured
LMArena WebDev1418Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
AA Coding Index37.8Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.9%83.9%GPT-5
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)69.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)20.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)84.6%80.8%GPT-5
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%37.1%GPT-5
Terminal-Bench49.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
GSO-Bench6.9%8.8%o3
WeirdML60.7%52.4%GPT-5
ALE-Bench807.6933.5o3
LMArena Text: coding14361407GPT-5
LMArena Text: software and IT14201415GPT-5
LMArena WebDev: HTML1427Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
SciCode0.0%9.2%o3
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5 and o3
BenchmarkGPT-5o3Leader
AA Intelligence Index23.020.2GPT-5
Epoch Capabilities Index150.0146.7GPT-5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5 and o3
BenchmarkGPT-5o3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom86.5%80.7%GPT-5
METR time horizons69.6%65.4%GPT-5
Remote Labor Index1.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
GDPval34.8%30.8%GPT-5
BALROG32.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
DeepResearch Bench49.6%45.2%GPT-5
OSWorldNot measured23.0%Only o3 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured63.0%Only o3 measured
BrowseComp-Plus80.0%65.9%GPT-5
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index152
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5 and o3
BenchmarkGPT-5o3Leader
GPQA Diamond85.6%84.1%GPT-5
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)81.5%80.4%GPT-5
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.4%82.7%GPT-5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.5%20.1%GPT-5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.2%81.8%GPT-5
ARC-AGI65.7%60.8%GPT-5
ARC-AGI-29.9%6.5%GPT-5
SimpleBench56.7%53.1%GPT-5
Chess puzzles36.0%37.0%o3
Mystery game puzzles23.0%29.0%o3
EBR-bench12.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
VPCT66.0%52.0%GPT-5
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151402GPT-5
LMArena Text: expert14191402GPT-5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14191411GPT-5
LMArena Vision: diagrams12521220GPT-5
LMArena Vision: homework12781234GPT-5
Kagi LLM Benchmark72.7%67.6%GPT-5
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index82
Math benchmarks for GPT-5 and o3
BenchmarkGPT-5o3Leader
AIME93.4%85.3%GPT-5
MATH 500 (Vals AI)96.0%94.6%GPT-5
MGSM (Vals AI)92.8%91.8%GPT-5
AA Math Index94.388.3GPT-5
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)94.3%88.3%GPT-5
OTIS Mock AIME91.4%84.4%GPT-5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 355.4%33.3%GPT-5
FrontierMath, tier 422.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
ProofBench18.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
MATH level 598.1%97.8%GPT-5
LMArena Text: math14071426o3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14051423o3
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index114
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5 and o3
BenchmarkGPT-5o3Leader
MMLU Pro86.5%85.6%GPT-5
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%83.8%GPT-5
CaseLaw (Vals AI)66.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.1%59.7%GPT-5
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.4%74.6%o3
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.5%65.7%o3
MedQA (Vals AI)96.3%96.1%GPT-5
MedCode (Vals AI)49.6%47.3%GPT-5
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)87.1%85.3%GPT-5
SimpleQA Verified50.1%49.4%GPT-5
GeoBench81.0%74.0%GPT-5
LMArena Text: science14161429o3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14131448o3
LMArena Text: legal and government14311428GPT-5
LMArena Text: business and finance14001393GPT-5
FACTS Benchmark Suite56.5%44.4%GPT-5
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5 and o3
BenchmarkGPT-5o3Leader
Design Arena: websites11841036GPT-5
Design Arena: UI components11801017GPT-5
Design Arena: game dev11851034GPT-5
Design Arena: data viz12211200GPT-5
Design Arena: 3D1056Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories11681020GPT-5
Design Arena: SVG1189Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index249
General benchmarks for GPT-5 and o3
BenchmarkGPT-5o3Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)43.7%41.8%GPT-5
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.7%76.7%GPT-5
IFBench73.1%71.4%GPT-5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.2%74.7%GPT-5
DTBench90.7%84.8%GPT-5
LMCA40.0%39.7%GPT-5
Fiction.LiveBench97.2%88.9%GPT-5
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)86.0%83.9%GPT-5
CL-benchNot measured17.8%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text14061410o3
LMArena Text: instruction following13881368GPT-5
LMArena Text: creative writing13651359GPT-5
LMArena Vision12321214GPT-5
LMArena Text: English14091417o3
LMArena Text: non-English13971401o3
LMArena Text: Chinese14221437o3
LMArena Text: German14161420o3
LMArena Text: Japanese14091403GPT-5
LMArena Text: Korean13601370o3
LMArena Text: French14091430o3
LMArena Text: Spanish13991395GPT-5
LMArena Text: Russian14071406GPT-5
LMArena Text: Polish14311438o3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14261405GPT-5
LMArena Text: longer queries13991372GPT-5
LMArena Text: writing and language13841372GPT-5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13791373GPT-5
LMArena Vision: English12311221GPT-5
LMArena Vision: Chinese12671237GPT-5
LMArena Vision: reading text12461218GPT-5
LMArena Vision: humor12191222o3
LMArena Vision: captioning12121210GPT-5
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12631234GPT-5
LMArena Vision: creative writing12101201GPT-5
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5 and o3
BenchmarkGPT-5o3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5$0.0063Fits in one request
o3$0.0060Fits in one request

o3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5$0.092Fits in one request
o3$0.124Fits in one request

GPT-5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5$0.350Fits in one request
o3$0.480Exceeds the context window

GPT-5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5 and o3
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5OpenAI o3
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 7, 2025April 16, 2025
Context window400K200K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$2.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$8.00
Coding index38.8Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.39$0.571
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5 better than o3 for coding?

Only GPT-5 has a coding score, 38.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($8.00 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by GSO-Bench or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 or o3?

GPT-5 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; o3 costs $2.00 and $8.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5 costs $0.39 and o3 $0.571.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5 or o3?

GPT-5, with 400K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5 vs o3 comparison based on?

98 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and o3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next