Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5 Mini vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

GPT-5 Mini leads Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.6 to 6.7, and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs 2.0x less per output token ($1.00 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5 MiniOpenAI
Coding
34.2
Overall
43.7
Output $/M
$2.00
29
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 29 shared

GPT-5 Mini or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which to pick

Only GPT-5 Mini has a coding score, 34.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($1.00 vs $2.00 per million).

Shared results
29
GPT-5 Mini only
72
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
6
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5 Mini 34.2 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 27.7 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-5 Mini 83.8% against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 29.5%, 54.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5 Mini $2.00 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5 Mini takes 400K tokens, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5 MiniBarsQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTies
Coding40
Intelligence20
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge50
General110
All shared boards290
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured16.4%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Verified59.8%47.0%GPT-5 Mini
SWE-bench Multilingual39.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)60.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%29.5%GPT-5 Mini
SciCode39.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
WeirdML52.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding14061276GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: software and IT13941261GPT-5 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.66.7GPT-5 Mini
Epoch Capabilities Index145.3119.5GPT-5 Mini
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom71.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Vending-Bench 2-$31Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)55.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond80.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)78.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)82.8%41.7%GPT-5 Mini
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)21.5%3.5%GPT-5 Mini
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)75.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
ARC-AGI54.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-24.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Chess puzzles24.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
VPCT40.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13801251GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: expert13791221GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13831269GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Vision: diagrams1202Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1210Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AIME91.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
AA Math Index90.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)90.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME86.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 346.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 412.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
ProofBench9.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MATH level 597.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
GSM8KNot measured93.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math13781251GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: mathematical work13801243GPT-5 Mini
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro82.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.7%63.5%GPT-5 Mini
SimpleQA Verified21.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MMLUNot measured79.1%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured70.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science13711221GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13801187GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: legal and government13751257GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: business and finance13581224GPT-5 Mini
FACTS Benchmark Suite38.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1125Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: UI components1103Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: game dev1129Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: data viz1131Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: 3D1036Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categories1114Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: SVG1091Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1125Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
General benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
IFBench75.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
DTBench80.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMCA34.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBench69.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)83.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
HellaSwagNot measured83.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured80.8%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text13731230GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: instruction following13571223GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: creative writing13251174GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Vision1202Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English13791248GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: non-English13631205GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: Chinese13861222GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: German1366Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1341Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French1386Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1354Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian13621228GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: Polish1378Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13631222GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: longer queries13551251GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: writing and language13441191GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13401150GPT-5 Mini
LMArena Vision: English1216Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1214Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1199Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1205Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1217Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1226Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1181Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5 Mini and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5 Mini$0.0013Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5 Mini$0.018Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window

GPT-5 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5 Mini$0.070Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window

GPT-5 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5 Mini and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5 MiniQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 7, 2025November 11, 2024
Context window400K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.66
Output $/Mtok$2.00$1.00
Coding index34.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved task$0.08Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5 Mini better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for coding?

Only GPT-5 Mini has a coding score, 34.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($1.00 vs $2.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Mini or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

GPT-5 Mini costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5 Mini or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

GPT-5 Mini, with 400K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5 Mini vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5 Mini's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next