Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 136.1x less per output token than GPT-5.6 Sol Pro ($0.147 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-5.6 Sol ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA
Coding
22.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.147
vs $20.00 vs $0.147 per 1M output tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 136.1x cheaper.

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has a coding score, 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.6 Sol Pro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-5.6 Sol Pro for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.6 Sol Pro has results on WeirdML, APEX-Agents and SimpleBench; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning on AA Coding Index, SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 22.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro $20.00 against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning $0.147 per million output tokens, 136.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured26.8Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured52.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured3.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured10.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured29.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
SciCodeNot measured32.1%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
WeirdML89.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
ALE-BenchNot measured769.2Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.9Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured3.5Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured2.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
APEX-Agents51.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.3%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured10.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
SimpleBench71.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
Chess puzzles68.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
FrontierMath, tier 480.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured54.2%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured60.3%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
DTBench96.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
LMCA59.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.6 Sol Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro$0.014Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0001Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro$0.260Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0031Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro$1.00Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.012Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol ProNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
MakerOpenAINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 9, 2026August 11, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$4.00$0.0534
Output $/Mtok$20.00$0.147
Coding indexNot benchmarked22.6
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.06
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.6 Sol Pro better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning for coding?

Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has a coding score, 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.6 Sol Pro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5.6 Sol Pro for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Sol Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs $0.0534 and $0.147. Cost per solved task is known for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.6 Sol Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

GPT-5.6 Sol Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.6 Sol Pro has results on WeirdML, APEX-Agents and SimpleBench; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning on AA Coding Index, SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next