LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs o3 Mini

Updated October 21, 2026. 39 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
3.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
2
o3 MiniOpenAI
Coding
52.1
Overall
12.5
Output $/M
$4.40
37
vs boards won of 39 shared

Decision reading

Pick o3 Mini for coding: it scores 52.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18).

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 7.3x less, or when what matters is Mystery game puzzles or Creative writing (Lech Mazur), where it leads.

Shared results
39
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
7
o3 Mini only
31
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 3.6 from 1 benchmark, o3 Mini 52.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 34.9 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 6.9% against o3 Mini 76.9%, 70.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 against o3 Mini $4.40 per million output tokens, 7.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) takes 128K tokens, o3 Mini 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Barso3 MiniTies
Coding04
Reasoning16
Math05
Knowledge05
General117
All shared boards237
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and o3 Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)o3 MiniLeader
Aider polyglot3.6%60.4%o3 Mini
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured42.4%Only o3 Mini measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured32.3%Only o3 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured71.5%Only o3 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured73.4%Only o3 Mini measured
SciCodeNot measured42.8%Only o3 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only o3 Mini measured
GSO-BenchNot measured1.3%Only o3 Mini measured
WeirdML11.8%43.7%o3 Mini
CybenchNot measured22.5%Only o3 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding12901378o3 Mini
LMArena Text: software and IT12911364o3 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and o3 Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)o3 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.5Only o3 Mini measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured140.2Only o3 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and o3 Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)o3 MiniLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured31.3%Only o3 Mini measured
BALROG17.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and o3 Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)o3 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured75.5%Only o3 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.3%Only o3 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured12.0%Only o3 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)37.7%77.0%o3 Mini
ARC-AGINot measured34.5%Only o3 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured3.0%Only o3 Mini measured
SimpleBench10.7%22.8%o3 Mini
Chess puzzles3.0%15.0%o3 Mini
Mystery game puzzles12.0%7.0%GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
VPCT34.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12671365o3 Mini
LMArena Text: expert12341364o3 Mini
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12781375o3 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and o3 Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)o3 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured86.5%Only o3 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured91.8%Only o3 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured91.3%Only o3 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.9%76.9%o3 Mini
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.7%18.6%o3 Mini
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured0.0%Only o3 Mini measured
MATH level 552.6%96.5%o3 Mini
LMArena Text: math12671396o3 Mini
LMArena Text: mathematical work12711399o3 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and o3 Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)o3 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured78.7%Only o3 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured71.5%Only o3 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only o3 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only o3 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured94.8%Only o3 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.2%Only o3 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified8.3%15.3%o3 Mini
MMLU76.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science12861339o3 Mini
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12821330o3 Mini
LMArena Text: legal and government13051328o3 Mini
LMArena Text: business and finance12651313o3 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and o3 Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)o3 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index117
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and o3 Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)o3 MiniLeader
IFBenchNot measured67.1%Only o3 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured43.0%Only o3 Mini measured
DTBenchNot measured68.8%Only o3 Mini measured
LMCANot measured19.0%Only o3 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured50.0%Only o3 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)67.2%61.7%GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text12861337o3 Mini
LMArena Text: instruction following12581337o3 Mini
LMArena Text: creative writing12681286o3 Mini
LMArena Vision1066Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: English13011351o3 Mini
LMArena Text: non-English12661319o3 Mini
LMArena Text: Chinese12651379o3 Mini
LMArena Text: German12721303o3 Mini
LMArena Text: Japanese12161286o3 Mini
LMArena Text: Korean11951313o3 Mini
LMArena Text: French12971334o3 Mini
LMArena Text: Spanish12761321o3 Mini
LMArena Text: Russian12751304o3 Mini
LMArena Text: Polish12441294o3 Mini
LMArena Text: multi-turn12851320o3 Mini
LMArena Text: longer queries12891343o3 Mini
LMArena Text: writing and language12821313o3 Mini
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12531283o3 Mini
LMArena Vision: English1072Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1033Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and o3 Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)o3 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request
o3 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request
o3 Mini$0.068Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window
o3 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and o3 Mini
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI o3 Mini
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024January 31, 2025
Context window128K200K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.10
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.40
Coding index3.652.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) better than o3 Mini for coding?

Pick o3 Mini for coding: it scores 52.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18). Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 7.3x less, or when what matters is Mystery game puzzles or Creative writing (Lech Mazur), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or o3 Mini?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; o3 Mini costs $1.10 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or o3 Mini?

o3 Mini, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs o3 Mini comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and o3 Mini's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next