Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs o4 Mini

GLM 5V Turbo leads o4 Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 16.7, at about the same output price ($4.00 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 50 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
49
o4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
43.0
Output $/M
$4.40
1
vs boards won of 50 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or o4 Mini: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($4.00 vs $4.40 per million) and a larger context window (203K against 200K tokens).

Shared results
50
GLM 5V Turbo only
15
o4 Mini only
52
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, o4 Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 43.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: GLM 5V Turbo 1208 against o4 Mini 854, 44.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against o4 Mini $4.40 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, o4 Mini 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarso4 MiniTies
Coding30
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning70
Math20
Knowledge40
Web design60
General251
All shared boards491
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turboo4 MiniLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured72.0%Only o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured64.6%Only o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured33.9%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only o4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.9%Only o4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%15.2%GLM 5V Turbo
GSO-BenchNot measured3.6%Only o4 Mini measured
WeirdMLNot measured52.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding14661368GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT14601367GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
SciCodeNot measured10.8%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turboo4 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.516.7GLM 5V Turbo
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured145.5Only o4 Mini measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turboo4 MiniLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1060Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1126Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%55.6%GLM 5V Turbo
METR time horizonsNot measured63.9%Only o4 Mini measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured53.2%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turboo4 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured74.5%Only o4 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%78.4%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%16.5%GLM 5V Turbo
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured79.6%Only o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGINot measured58.7%Only o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured6.1%Only o4 Mini measured
SimpleBenchNot measured38.7%Only o4 Mini measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only o4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured5.0%Only o4 Mini measured
VPCTNot measured57.5%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431351GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert14531343GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561366GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagrams12861197GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: homework12731234GLM 5V Turbo
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured67.6%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turboo4 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured83.7%Only o4 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.2%Only o4 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured93.4%Only o4 Mini measured
AA Math IndexNot measured90.7Only o4 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.7%Only o4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured81.7%Only o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured36.1%Only o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured4.9%Only o4 Mini measured
MATH level 5Not measured97.8%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math14421389GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work14471379GLM 5V Turbo
MathArenaNot measured14.8%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turboo4 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured80.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.2%Only o4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.0%Only o4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.0%Only o4 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured33.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.2%Only o4 Mini measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured19.6%Only o4 Mini measured
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science14481354GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331361GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government14361350GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance14351325GLM 5V Turbo
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured28.1%Only o4 Mini measured
PRBench FinanceNot measured39.2%Only o4 Mini measured
PRBench LegalNot measured38.1%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turboo4 MiniLeader
Design Arena: websites1230985GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components1210981GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: game dev12181003GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz1202991GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: 3D1208854GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories1227976GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG1150Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1116Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index251
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turboo4 MiniLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only o4 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured69.1%Only o4 Mini measured
IFBench61.1%68.7%o4 Mini
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%61.0%GLM 5V Turbo
DTBenchNot measured77.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LMCANot measured26.5%Only o4 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured77.8%Only o4 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured75.0%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text14371353GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following14231320GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing14171294GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision12641194GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: English14541367GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201337GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14911354GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German14221336GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1308Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean13971312GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French14431364GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish14521346GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14321334GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish14321358GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311350GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries14381315GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14201316GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071308GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: English12741200GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: Chinese13291218GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: reading text12701197GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: humor12681199GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: captioning12641204GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12411218GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: creative writing12521166GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
MultiChallengeNot measured44.9%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and o4 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turboo4 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.068Fits in one request

o4 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
o4 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window

o4 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and o4 Mini
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboOpenAI o4 Mini
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026April 16, 2025
Context window203K200K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$1.10
Output $/Mtok$4.00$4.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than o4 Mini for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($4.00 vs $4.40 per million) and a larger context window (203K against 200K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or o4 Mini?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; o4 Mini costs $1.10 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or o4 Mini?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs o4 Mini comparison based on?

50 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and o4 Mini's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next