Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

GLM 5.3 FlashX costs 1.9x less per output token than Nemotron 3 Ultra ($1.25 vs $2.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GLM 5.3 FlashXZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.25
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.40
vs $1.25 vs $2.40 per 1M output tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX is 1.9x cheaper.

GLM 5.3 FlashX or Nemotron 3 Ultra: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5.3 FlashX has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5.3 FlashX for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($1.25 vs $2.40 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5.3 FlashX has none yet; Nemotron 3 Ultra on AA Coding Index, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5.3 FlashX not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GLM 5.3 FlashX $1.25 against Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
GLM 5.3 FlashX takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3 Ultra 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured49.3Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SciCodeNot measured40.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured36.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
FrontierCodeNot measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
WeirdMLNot measured43.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured22.9Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.0Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured20.1Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured83.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured22.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MCP AtlasNot measured63.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXNemotron 3 UltraLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured85.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured20.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1453Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXNemotron 3 UltraLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProofBenchNot measured2.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1457Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1461Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXNemotron 3 UltraLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1465Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1456Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1434Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXNemotron 3 UltraLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1145Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1135Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1138Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1141Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1131Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1146Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1069Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1100Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards measured
General benchmarks for GLM 5.3 FlashX and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashXNemotron 3 UltraLeader
IFBenchNot measured81.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
DTBenchNot measured90.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMCANot measured36.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena TextNot measured1445Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1399Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1455Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1427Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1497Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1384Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1455Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1417Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1385Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1437Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1406Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.0010Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0018Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 FlashX costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.022Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.037Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 FlashX costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5.3 FlashX$0.086Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.144Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 FlashX costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5.3 FlashX and Nemotron 3 Ultra
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5.3 FlashXNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
MakerZ.aiNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 18, 2026June 4, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.37$0.60
Output $/Mtok$1.25$2.40
Coding indexNot benchmarked30.0
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5.3 FlashX better than Nemotron 3 Ultra for coding?

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5.3 FlashX has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5.3 FlashX for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($1.25 vs $2.40 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

GLM 5.3 FlashX costs $0.37 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

GLM 5.3 FlashX, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both GLM 5.3 FlashX and Nemotron 3 Ultra?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5.3 FlashX has none yet; Nemotron 3 Ultra on AA Coding Index, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next