Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.6 vs Inkling 2 Small

Inkling 2 Small leads GLM 4.6 on coding, 48.9 to 8.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Inkling 2 Small costs 2.2x less per output token ($1.00 vs $2.20 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 24 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.6Z.ai
Coding
8.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
15
T Inkling 2 SmallThinking Machines
Coding
48.9
Overall
56.9
Output $/M
$1.00
9
vs boards won of 24 shared

GLM 4.6 or Inkling 2 Small: which to pick

Pick Inkling 2 Small for coding: it scores 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 8.9 for GLM 4.6.

Pick GLM 4.6 for work measured by LMArena Text: software and IT or LMArena Text: hard prompts, where it leads.

Shared results
24
GLM 4.6 only
45
Inkling 2 Small only
27
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.6 8.9 from 2 benchmarks, Inkling 2 Small 48.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 33.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): GLM 4.6 3.1% against Inkling 2 Small 81.5%, 78.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.6 $2.20 against Inkling 2 Small $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.6 takes 205K tokens, Inkling 2 Small 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.6BarsInkling 2 SmallTies
Coding14
Reasoning22
Math01
Knowledge20
General102
All shared boards159
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.6 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGLM 4.6Inkling 2 SmallLeader
SWE-bench Verified68.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev13431647Inkling 2 Small
AA Coding Index45.8Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured12.6%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)3.1%81.5%Inkling 2 Small
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured43.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)69.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
SciCodeNot measured52.3%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
FrontierCode 2.0Not measured25.4%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench24.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
ALE-Bench340.8Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding14491455Inkling 2 Small
LMArena Text: software and IT14551443GLM 4.6
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1660Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13511661Inkling 2 Small
SWE-Bench Pro V2Not measured97.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench 2.024.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.6 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGLM 4.6Inkling 2 SmallLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured30.6Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.6 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGLM 4.6Inkling 2 SmallLeader
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1003Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1088Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1072Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1180Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured46.6%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured21.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured32.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
τ²-Bench Telecom76.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured46.8%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)72.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
BrowseComp-Plus48.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured85.4%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.6 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGLM 4.6Inkling 2 SmallLeader
GPQA Diamond74.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured25.2%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)78.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.5%44.1%Inkling 2 Small
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.0%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
ARC-AGINot measured96.5%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured81.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14401421GLM 4.6
LMArena Text: expert14331478Inkling 2 Small
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14451424GLM 4.6
Kagi LLM Benchmark45.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.6 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGLM 4.6Inkling 2 SmallLeader
AIME92.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)89.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math1432Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1448Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
MathArena16.2%42.4%Inkling 2 Small
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.6 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGLM 4.6Inkling 2 SmallLeader
MMLU Pro82.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)56.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
AA-OmniscienceNot measured16.1Only Inkling 2 Small measured
LMArena Text: science14561409GLM 4.6
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1455Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1448Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance14161415GLM 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.6 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGLM 4.6Inkling 2 SmallLeader
Design Arena: websites1166Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI components1138Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev1140Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Design Arena: data viz1158Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1108Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1155Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1098Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index102
General benchmarks for GLM 4.6 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGLM 4.6Inkling 2 SmallLeader
Vals IndexNot measured56.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured88.6%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
IFBench43.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)54.0%83.3%Inkling 2 Small
GDPval-AA7641630Inkling 2 Small
LMArena Text14401403GLM 4.6
LMArena Text: instruction following14101408GLM 4.6
LMArena Text: creative writing14121348GLM 4.6
LMArena Text: English14491418GLM 4.6
LMArena Text: non-English14261390GLM 4.6
LMArena Text: Chinese1500Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: German1447Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1394Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1400Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French1461Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1437Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14181377GLM 4.6
LMArena Text: Polish1447Not measuredOnly GLM 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14271408GLM 4.6
LMArena Text: longer queries14221403GLM 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language14161381GLM 4.6
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14091359GLM 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.6 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkGLM 4.6Inkling 2 SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.6$0.0017Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.0008Fits in one request

Inkling 2 Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.6$0.037Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.018Fits in one request

Inkling 2 Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.6$0.142Exceeds the context window
Inkling 2 Small$0.070Fits in one request

Inkling 2 Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.6 and Inkling 2 Small
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.6Thinking Machines Inkling 2 Small
MakerZ.aiThinking Machines
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 30, 2025November 9, 2026
Context window205K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.60$0.30
Output $/Mtok$2.20$1.00
Coding index8.948.9
Independent measurements behind it23
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.6 better than Inkling 2 Small for coding?

Pick Inkling 2 Small for coding: it scores 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 8.9 for GLM 4.6. Pick GLM 4.6 for work measured by LMArena Text: software and IT or LMArena Text: hard prompts, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.6 or Inkling 2 Small?

GLM 4.6 costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Inkling 2 Small costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.6 or Inkling 2 Small?

Inkling 2 Small, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.6 vs Inkling 2 Small comparison based on?

24 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. GLM 4.6's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Inkling 2 Small's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/glm-4-6-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-2-small" title="GLM 4.6 vs Inkling 2 Small, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/glm-4-6-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-2-small">LLMBenchmark.ai, GLM 4.6 vs Inkling 2 Small</a></p>