Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 1.6x less per output token than Nemotron 3 Ultra ($1.50 vs $2.40 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
2
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.40
12
vs boards won of 14 shared

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Nemotron 3 Ultra: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.40 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
14
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite only
3
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
57
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 29.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 31.3% against Nemotron 3 Ultra 83.3%, 52.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $1.50 against Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3 Ultra 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash LiteBarsNemotron 3 UltraTies
Coding21
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning03
Math01
General04
All shared boards212
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured49.3Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SciCode43.4%40.3%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)24.2%36.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
FrontierCodeNot measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
WeirdML52.2%43.5%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1467Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured22.9Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Epoch Capabilities Index144.3146.0Nemotron 3 Ultra
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured20.1Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
τ²-Bench Telecom31.3%83.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra
APEX-AgentsNot measured22.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
DeepResearch Bench37.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
MCP Atlas57.1%63.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNemotron 3 UltraLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)82.2%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.2%28.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)81.8%85.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured20.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1453Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNemotron 3 UltraLeader
OTIS Mock AIME80.0%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 327.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
ProofBenchNot measured2.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1457Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1462Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNemotron 3 UltraLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1465Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1455Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1453Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNemotron 3 UltraLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1145Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1135Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1138Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1142Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1132Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1146Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1069Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1100Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNemotron 3 UltraLeader
IFBench77.2%81.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.3%79.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra
DTBench76.8%90.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMCA35.0%36.9%Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena TextNot measured1445Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1398Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1454Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1427Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1498Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1474Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1385Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1473Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1454Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1417Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1385Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1437Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1405Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteNemotron 3 UltraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$0.0010Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0018Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$0.017Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.037Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$0.065Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.144Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Ultra
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
MakerGoogleNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 7, 2026June 4, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.60
Output $/Mtok$1.50$2.40
Coding indexNot benchmarked30.0
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Nemotron 3 Ultra for coding?

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.40 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3 Ultra comparison based on?

14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Ultra's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next