Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ember-1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Ember-1 leads Nemotron 3 Ultra on coding, 52.6 to 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Nemotron 3 Ultra costs 6.3x less per output token ($2.40 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Ember-1Fireworks
Coding
52.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$15.00
5
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.40
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

Ember-1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra: which to pick

Pick Ember-1 for coding: it scores 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for Nemotron 3 Ultra, though on 2 benchmarks against 3.

Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($2.40 vs $15.00 per million).

Shared results
5
Ember-1 only
9
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
66
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 51.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Ember-1 83.9% against Nemotron 3 Ultra 7.6%, 76.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Ember-1 $15.00 against Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 per million output tokens, 6.3x apart.
Context window
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3 Ultra 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryEmber-1BarsNemotron 3 UltraTies
Coding20
Agentic work30
All shared boards50
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured49.3Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.9%7.6%Ember-1
Code migration (Vals AI)32.5%4.9%Ember-1
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
IOI (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
SciCodeNot measured40.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured36.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
FrontierCodeNot measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
WeirdMLNot measured43.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured22.9Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.0Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Agentic work benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured20.1Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.8%37.7%Ember-1
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.1%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)44.7%15.4%Ember-1
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.4%31.7%Ember-1
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vals Science Index31.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured83.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured22.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MCP AtlasNot measured63.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)22.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured85.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured20.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1453Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProofBenchNot measured2.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1457Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1461Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1465Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1456Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1434Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1145Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1135Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1138Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1141Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1131Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1146Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1069Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1100Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IFBenchNot measured81.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
DTBenchNot measured90.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMCANot measured36.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena TextNot measured1445Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1399Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1455Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1427Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1497Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1384Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1455Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1417Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1385Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1437Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1406Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ember-1$0.011Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0018Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ember-1$0.195Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.037Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ember-1$0.750Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.144Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
SpecificationFireworks Ember-1NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
MakerFireworksNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 24, 2026June 4, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.60
Output $/Mtok$15.00$2.40
Coding index52.630.0
Independent measurements behind it23
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ember-1 better than Nemotron 3 Ultra for coding?

Pick Ember-1 for coding: it scores 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for Nemotron 3 Ultra, though on 2 benchmarks against 3. Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($2.40 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Ember-1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Ember-1's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Ultra's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/fireworks-ember-1-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b" title="Ember-1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/fireworks-ember-1-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b">LLMBenchmark.ai, Ember-1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra</a></p>