Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Mercury 2.5

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 leads Mercury 2.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.4 to 12.3, and Mercury 2.5 costs 1.9x less per output token ($0.15 vs $0.28 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.28
2
Mercury 2.5Inception
Coding
1.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
0
vs boards won of 2 shared

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or Mercury 2.5: which to pick

Only Mercury 2.5 has a coding score, 1.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 for a larger context window (1.05M against 260K tokens) and work measured by ALE-Bench or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
2
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 only
47
Mercury 2.5 only
20
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 not benchmarked, Mercury 2.5 1.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 12.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 678.2 against Mercury 2.5 301.6, 12.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 $0.28 against Mercury 2.5 $0.15 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 takes 1.05M tokens, Mercury 2.5 260K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423BarsMercury 2.5Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
All shared boards20
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Mercury 2.5Leader
LMArena WebDev1582Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
AA Coding Index52.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured3.7%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.5%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured2.4%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured34.5%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured18.1%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured45.5%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured38.5%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
WeirdML45.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
ALE-Bench678.2301.6DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
LMArena Text: coding1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1453Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1585Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1558Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Mercury 2.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index24.412.3DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Epoch Capabilities Index146.1Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Mercury 2.5Leader
AA Agentic Index26.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured18.9%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured2.5%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Mercury 2.5Leader
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured11.8%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
SimpleBench46.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1444Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: expert1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Mercury 2.5Leader
ProofBenchNot measured3.0%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1426Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Mercury 2.5Leader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.1%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured31.3%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1448Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Mercury 2.5Leader
Design Arena: websites1208Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: UI components1165Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: game dev1197Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: data viz1127Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: 3D1189Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1205Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: SVG1155Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1109Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Mercury 2.5Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured71.7%Only Mercury 2.5 measured
DTBench86.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMCA35.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1421Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1403Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: English1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1463Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: German1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1389Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1383Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: French1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1427Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1410Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1400Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Mercury 2.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Mercury 2.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.0003Fits in one request
Mercury 2.5$0.0001Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.0073Fits in one request
Mercury 2.5$0.0024Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.029Fits in one request
Mercury 2.5$0.0095Fits in one request

Mercury 2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Mercury 2.5
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Inception Mercury 2.5
MakerDeepSeekInception
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 24, 2026September 8, 2026
Context window1.05M260K
Input $/Mtok$0.13$0.04
Output $/Mtok$0.28$0.15
Coding indexNot benchmarked1.6
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 better than Mercury 2.5 for coding?

Only Mercury 2.5 has a coding score, 1.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 for a larger context window (1.05M against 260K tokens) and work measured by ALE-Bench or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or Mercury 2.5?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Mercury 2.5 costs $0.04 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or Mercury 2.5?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423, with 1.05M tokens against 260K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Mercury 2.5 comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mercury 2.5's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next