LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 4 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Coding
37.6
Overall
34.8
Output $/M
$0.6468
1
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Coding
61.9
Overall
37.9
Output $/M
$0.28
3
vs boards won of 4 shared

Decision reading

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 61.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.6 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp when the benchmark that matters is Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Shared results
4
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp only
10
MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
62
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 37.6 from 1 benchmark, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 61.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
General, 7.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 81.3% against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 74.3%, 7.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $0.6468 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpBarsMiMo-V2.6-FlashTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
General10
All shared boards13
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LiveBench coding37.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1634Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
AA Coding Index65.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured24.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured76.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SciCode49.7%51.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ALE-BenchNot measured1244.2Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1499Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1497Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1648Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1641Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1596Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index34.837.9MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index47.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench research69.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured56.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured31.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoning85.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)34.5%35.1%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1475Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1496Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1493Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1276Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1283Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
ProofBenchNot measured63.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1476Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1478Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1462Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1439Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1441Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1454Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LiveBench design70.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured54.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.3%74.3%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
LMArena TextNot measured1453Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1452Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1403Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1256Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1476Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1431Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1509Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1458Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1359Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1425Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1480Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1453Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1409Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1455Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1447Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1459Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1424Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1415Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1269Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1231Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.013Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0078Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.050Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.031Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpXiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MakerDeepSeekXiaomi
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 21, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.2156$0.14
Output $/Mtok$0.6468$0.28
Coding index37.661.9
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 61.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.6 for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp when the benchmark that matters is Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.2156 per million input tokens and $0.6468 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next