Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen-Plus

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
39.5
Output $/M
$0.60
Qwen-PlusQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.78
vs $0.60 vs $0.78 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 1.3x cheaper.

Decision reading

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen-Plus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI); Qwen-Plus on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen-Plus not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Qwen-Plus $0.78 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen-Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen-PlusLeader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev1664Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SciCode55.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
ALE-Bench1622.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1328Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1343Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena WebDev: React1667Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1687Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen-PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen-PlusLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1233Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen-PlusLeader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured48.1%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1317Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1328Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1333Only Qwen-Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen-PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured17.8%Only Qwen-Plus measured
MATH level 5Not measured65.3%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1326Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1332Only Qwen-Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen-PlusLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1352Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1350Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1349Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1303Only Qwen-Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen-PlusLeader
Design Arena: websites1312Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: UI components1300Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: game dev1363Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: data viz1335Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: 3D1372Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1335Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1244Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards measured
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen-PlusLeader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
DTBenchNot measured81.1%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMCANot measured24.0%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena TextNot measured1326Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1303Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1292Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1339Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1310Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1347Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1251Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1323Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1336Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1324Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1296Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1270Only Qwen-Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.0006Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.015Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.060Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen-Plus
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen-Plus
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026February 1, 2025
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.26
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.78
Coding index70.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Qwen-Plus for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen-Plus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen-Plus?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen-Plus costs $0.26 and $0.78. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen-Plus?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

Has any benchmark tested both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen-Plus?

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI); Qwen-Plus on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next