LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-4

Updated October 21, 2026. 1 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
83.3
Overall
39.5
Output $/M
$0.60
1
GPT-4OpenAI
Coding
22.4
Overall
6.7
Output $/M
$60.00
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Decision reading

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores 83.3 and GPT-4 22.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 when output tokens cost 100.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 8K tokens.

Shared results
1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
31
GPT-4 only
44
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 83.3 from 2 benchmarks, GPT-4 22.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Intelligence, 32.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 39.5 against GPT-4 6.7, 32.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against GPT-4 $60.00 per million output tokens, 100.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-4 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsGPT-4Ties
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured22.4%Only GPT-4 measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured39.7%Only GPT-4 measured
SWE-bench (full test set)Not measured12.5%Only GPT-4 measured
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev1664Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured13.1Only GPT-4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SciCode55.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
ALE-Bench1622.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1209Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1195Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1667Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1687Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4Leader
AA Intelligence Index39.56.7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured125.7Only GPT-4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4Leader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1238Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4Leader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.9%Only GPT-4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
BIG-Bench HardNot measured75.1%Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1200Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1149Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1209Only GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4Leader
GSM8KNot measured92.0%Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1230Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1228Only GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured56.2%Only GPT-4 measured
MMLUNot measured86.4%Only GPT-4 measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured96.3%Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1177Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1145Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1191Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1145Only GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4Leader
Design Arena: websites1312Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: UI components1305Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: game dev1365Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: data viz1330Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: 3D1368Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1335Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1244Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4Leader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
IFBenchNot measured33.2%Only GPT-4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
DTBenchNot measured62.7%Only GPT-4 measured
LMCANot measured17.1%Only GPT-4 measured
HellaSwagNot measured95.3%Only GPT-4 measured
WinoGrandeNot measured87.5%Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1206Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1201Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1191Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1220Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1194Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1184Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1198Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1137Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1087Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1220Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1197Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1195Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1265Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1206Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1190Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1219Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1184Only GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
GPT-4$0.060Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
GPT-4$1.68Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
GPT-4$6.60Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GPT-4
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017OpenAI GPT-4
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026May 28, 2023
Context window1.05M8K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$30.00
Output $/Mtok$0.60$60.00
Coding index83.322.4
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than GPT-4 for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores 83.3 and GPT-4 22.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 when output tokens cost 100.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 8K tokens.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-4?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-4 costs $30.00 and $60.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GPT-4?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-4 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and GPT-4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next