LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

R1 0528 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Updated October 21, 2026. 53 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace R1 0528 Replace Llama 4 Maverick
R1 0528DeepSeek
Coding
71.4
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$2.15
52
Llama 4 MaverickMeta Llama
Coding
18.1
Overall
9.3
Output $/M
$0.6525
1
vs boards won of 53 shared

Decision reading

Pick R1 0528 for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.1 for Llama 4 Maverick, though on 1 benchmark against 2.

Pick Llama 4 Maverick when output tokens cost 3.3x less, or when the context window is larger, 524K against 164K tokens.

Model AR1 0528DeepSeek71.4/1001 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BLlama 4 MaverickMeta Llama18.1/1002 independent benchmarks$1.491 per solved task
Shared results
53
R1 0528 only
6
Llama 4 Maverick only
31
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
R1 0528 71.4 from 1 benchmark, Llama 4 Maverick 18.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 37.6 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: R1 0528 76.0 against Llama 4 Maverick 19.3, 56.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
R1 0528 $2.15 against Llama 4 Maverick $0.6525 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, Llama 4 Maverick 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryR1 0528BarsLlama 4 MaverickTies
Coding70
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning80
Math40
Knowledge50
Web design60
General201
All shared boards521
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for R1 0528 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkR1 0528Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Aider polyglot71.4%15.6%R1 0528
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured21.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured16.3Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured47.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%39.7%R1 0528
SciCodeNot measured31.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%6.8%R1 0528
WeirdML41.6%24.5%R1 0528
ALE-Bench804.1173.0R1 0528
LMArena Text: coding14271301R1 0528
LMArena Text: software and IT14351299R1 0528
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for R1 0528 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkR1 0528Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.19.3R1 0528
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured132.2Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for R1 0528 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkR1 0528Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.6Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%17.8%R1 0528
METR time horizons53.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Reasoning benchmarks for R1 0528 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkR1 0528Llama 4 MaverickLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured69.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured71.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%67.1%R1 0528
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%4.9%R1 0528
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)76.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ARC-AGI21.2%4.4%R1 0528
ARC-AGI-21.1%0.0%R1 0528
SimpleBench40.8%27.7%R1 0528
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151281R1 0528
LMArena Text: expert13941259R1 0528
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14221295R1 0528
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1134Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1164Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for R1 0528 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkR1 0528Llama 4 MaverickLeader
AIMENot measured25.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured85.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured92.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
AA Math Index76.019.3R1 0528
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%19.3%R1 0528
OTIS Mock AIME66.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
MATH level 596.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: math14001299R1 0528
LMArena Text: mathematical work14151295R1 0528
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for R1 0528 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkR1 0528Llama 4 MaverickLeader
MMLU ProNot measured79.4%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured77.8%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured49.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured66.6%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%80.9%R1 0528
GeoBenchNot measured52.0%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: science14301288R1 0528
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14451275R1 0528
LMArena Text: legal and government14191286R1 0528
LMArena Text: business and finance14021260R1 0528
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for R1 0528 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkR1 0528Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Design Arena: websites1149871R1 0528
Design Arena: UI components1102899R1 0528
Design Arena: game dev1098838R1 0528
Design Arena: data viz1182882R1 0528
Design Arena: 3D1111901R1 0528
Design Arena: all code categories1139880R1 0528
Design Arena: SVG1038Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index201
General benchmarks for R1 0528 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkR1 0528Llama 4 MaverickLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured35.7%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured54.2%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
IFBench39.6%43.0%Llama 4 Maverick
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%50.0%R1 0528
DTBenchNot measured61.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMCANot measured15.9%Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%46.2%R1 0528
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.9%62.0%R1 0528
LMArena Text14281287R1 0528
LMArena Text: instruction following13821267R1 0528
LMArena Text: creative writing14051266R1 0528
LMArena VisionNot measured1142Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Text: English14371303R1 0528
LMArena Text: non-English14121269R1 0528
LMArena Text: Chinese14421277R1 0528
LMArena Text: German14041291R1 0528
LMArena Text: Japanese13911206R1 0528
LMArena Text: Korean13601203R1 0528
LMArena Text: French14171259R1 0528
LMArena Text: Spanish14111293R1 0528
LMArena Text: Russian14231286R1 0528
LMArena Text: Polish14281275R1 0528
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051289R1 0528
LMArena Text: longer queries13911280R1 0528
LMArena Text: writing and language14021277R1 0528
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14001250R1 0528
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1150Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1141Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1143Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1100Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1099Only Llama 4 Maverick measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for R1 0528 and Llama 4 Maverick
BenchmarkR1 0528Llama 4 MaverickLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

R1 0528$0.0016Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.0005Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

R1 0528$0.031Fits in one request
Llama 4 Maverick$0.011Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

R1 0528$0.121Exceeds the context window
Llama 4 Maverick$0.044Fits in one request

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of R1 0528 and Llama 4 Maverick
SpecificationDeepSeek R1 0528Meta Llama 4 Maverick
MakerDeepSeekMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2025April 5, 2025
Context window164K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.1875
Output $/Mtok$2.15$0.6525
Coding index71.418.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.491
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is R1 0528 better than Llama 4 Maverick for coding?

Pick R1 0528 for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.1 for Llama 4 Maverick, though on 1 benchmark against 2. Pick Llama 4 Maverick when output tokens cost 3.3x less, or when the context window is larger, 524K against 164K tokens.

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or Llama 4 Maverick?

R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.15 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.1875 and $0.6525. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Maverick only.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick, with 524K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the R1 0528 vs Llama 4 Maverick comparison based on?

53 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. R1 0528's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Llama 4 Maverick's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next