Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs o4 Mini

Updated October 21, 2026. 25 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
o4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
16.7
Output $/M
$4.40
25
vs boards won of 25 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command R (08-2024) has the edge where output tokens cost 7.3x less, and where what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
25
Command R (08-2024) only
0
o4 Mini only
69
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, o4 Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 31.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: math: Command R (08-2024) 1188 against o4 Mini 1389, 33.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against o4 Mini $4.40 per million output tokens, 7.3x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, o4 Mini 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand R (08-2024)Barso4 MiniTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General014
All shared boards025
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o4 Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o4 MiniLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured72.0%Only o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured64.6%Only o4 Mini measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured33.9%Only o4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only o4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.9%Only o4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.2%Only o4 Mini measured
GSO-BenchNot measured3.6%Only o4 Mini measured
WeirdMLNot measured52.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding11871368o4 Mini
LMArena Text: software and IT11971367o4 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o4 Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o4 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured16.7Only o4 Mini measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured145.5Only o4 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o4 Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o4 MiniLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured55.6%Only o4 Mini measured
METR time horizonsNot measured63.9%Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o4 Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o4 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured74.5%Only o4 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.4%Only o4 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured16.5%Only o4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured79.6%Only o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGINot measured58.7%Only o4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured6.1%Only o4 Mini measured
SimpleBenchNot measured38.7%Only o4 Mini measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only o4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured5.0%Only o4 Mini measured
VPCTNot measured57.5%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11861351o4 Mini
LMArena Text: expert11731343o4 Mini
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11941366o4 Mini
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1197Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1234Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o4 Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o4 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured83.7%Only o4 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.2%Only o4 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured93.4%Only o4 Mini measured
AA Math IndexNot measured90.7Only o4 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.7%Only o4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured81.7%Only o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured36.1%Only o4 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured4.9%Only o4 Mini measured
MATH level 5Not measured97.8%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math11881389o4 Mini
LMArena Text: mathematical work11981379o4 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o4 Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o4 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured80.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.2%Only o4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.0%Only o4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.0%Only o4 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured33.8%Only o4 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.2%Only o4 Mini measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured19.6%Only o4 Mini measured
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science12521354o4 Mini
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12381361o4 Mini
LMArena Text: legal and government12681350o4 Mini
LMArena Text: business and finance12151325o4 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o4 Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o4 MiniLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured985Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured983Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1003Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured990Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured854Only o4 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured976Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index014
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o4 Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o4 MiniLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only o4 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured69.1%Only o4 Mini measured
IFBenchNot measured68.7%Only o4 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured61.0%Only o4 Mini measured
DTBenchNot measured77.6%Only o4 Mini measured
LMCANot measured26.5%Only o4 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured77.8%Only o4 Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured75.0%Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text12291353o4 Mini
LMArena Text: instruction following11971320o4 Mini
LMArena Text: creative writing12341294o4 Mini
LMArena VisionNot measured1194Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English12381367o4 Mini
LMArena Text: non-English12161337o4 Mini
LMArena Text: Chinese12271354o4 Mini
LMArena Text: German12161336o4 Mini
LMArena Text: Japanese11661308o4 Mini
LMArena Text: Korean11621312o4 Mini
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1364Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1346Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian12271334o4 Mini
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1358Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12131350o4 Mini
LMArena Text: longer queries12301315o4 Mini
LMArena Text: writing and language12411316o4 Mini
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12231308o4 Mini
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1200Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1218Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1197Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1199Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1204Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1218Only o4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1166Only o4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o4 Mini
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o4 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.0033Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
o4 Mini$0.068Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
o4 Mini$0.264Exceeds the context window

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and o4 Mini
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)OpenAI o4 Mini
MakerCohereOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024April 16, 2025
Context window128K200K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.10
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than o4 Mini for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command R (08-2024) has the edge where output tokens cost 7.3x less, and where what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or o4 Mini?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; o4 Mini costs $1.10 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or o4 Mini?

o4 Mini, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Command R (08-2024) vs o4 Mini comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command R (08-2024)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and o4 Mini's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next