Command A vs Kimi K2 0711
Updated October 21, 2026. 21 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Command A has the edge where the context window is larger, 256K against 131K tokens, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 21
- Command A only
- 39
- Kimi K2 0711 only
- 15
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Command A
Command A leads, 13.1 against 12.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Command A has a AA Agentic Index result, 1.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Kimi K2 0711
Kimi K2 0711 leads, 71.5% against 48.5%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
Kimi K2 0711
Kimi K2 0711 leads, 62.7% against 13.3%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Kimi K2 0711
Kimi K2 0711 leads, 79.4% against 69.2%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Kimi K2 0711 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1050.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Command A
Command A takes 256K tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Kimi K2 0711
Command A $0.0075, Kimi K2 0711 $0.0017 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Command A has the number, $2.69.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Command A not benchmarked, Kimi K2 0711 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 32.1 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- AIME: Command A 13.3% against Kimi K2 0711 62.7%, 49.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Command A $10.00 against Kimi K2 0711 $2.30 per million output tokens, 4.3x apart.
- Context window
- Command A takes 256K tokens, Kimi K2 0711 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Command A | Bars | Kimi K2 0711 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 2 | ||
| Math | 0 | 5 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 6 | ||
| General | 1 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 5 | 16 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12
| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | Not measured | 59.1% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 71.2% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| AA Coding Index | 27.8 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 35.1% | 70.5% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 7.8% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 17.6% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 28.7% | 55.6% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| SciCode | 38.5% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 25.0% | 15.9% | Command A |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 27.8% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 4.9% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 39.4% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1330 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1336 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 13.1 | 12.7 | Command A |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 140.0 | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 1.0 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 9.0% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 80.7% | 61.1% | Command A |
| Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.5% | 71.5% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 76.1% | 76.6% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 12.0% | 7.4% | Command A |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 26.3% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1326 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1296 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1335 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 13.3% | 62.7% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 76.2% | 94.2% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 85.7% | 91.0% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| AA Math Index | 13.0 | 57.0 | Kimi K2 0711 |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 13.0% | 57.0% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1300 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1312 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 69.2% | 79.4% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 79.7% | 81.5% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 64.5% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 46.0% | 50.4% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 61.4% | 70.2% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 80.5% | 84.0% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 19.7% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 71.2% | 82.4% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1339 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1334 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1348 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1315 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1050 | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1030 | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 974 | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1018 | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1033 | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 55.7% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| IFBench | 73.9% | 41.5% | Command A |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 52.7% | 53.0% | Kimi K2 0711 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMCA | 10.3% | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 61.1% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | Not measured | 85.6% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| CL-bench | Not measured | 11.9% | Only Kimi K2 0711 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1331 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1309 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1319 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1344 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1313 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1327 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1342 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1285 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1285 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1351 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1347 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1314 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1324 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1338 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1334 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1328 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1306 | Not measured | Only Command A measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Command A | Kimi K2 0711 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Kimi K2 0711 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Kimi K2 0711 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Kimi K2 0711 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Cohere Command A | MoonshotAI Kimi K2 0711 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Cohere | Moonshot AI |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | March 13, 2025 | July 11, 2025 |
| Context window | 256K | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $2.50 | $0.57 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $2.30 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $2.69 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Command A better than Kimi K2 0711 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A has the edge where the context window is larger, 256K against 131K tokens, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Kimi K2 0711?
Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 0711 costs $0.57 and $2.30. Cost per solved task is known for Command A only.
Which has the bigger context window, Command A or Kimi K2 0711?
Command A, with 256K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the Command A vs Kimi K2 0711 comparison based on?
21 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Kimi K2 0711's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.