Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Trinity Large Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Nemotron 3 Ultra leads Trinity Large Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.9 to 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking costs 3.0x less per output token ($0.80 vs $2.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 46 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Trinity Large Thinking Replace Nemotron 3 Ultra
Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.80
2
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.40
44
vs boards won of 46 shared

Trinity Large Thinking or Nemotron 3 Ultra: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Trinity Large Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Trinity Large Thinking for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($0.80 vs $2.40 per million) and work measured by SciCode or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Model ATrinity Large ThinkingArcee AINot benchmarked1 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BNemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA30.0/1003 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
Shared results
46
Trinity Large Thinking only
6
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
24
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Trinity Large Thinking not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 18.4 points apart on average over 18 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Trinity Large Thinking 38.0% against Nemotron 3 Ultra 79.3%, 41.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Trinity Large Thinking $0.80 against Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryTrinity Large ThinkingBarsNemotron 3 UltraTies
Coding14
Intelligence01
Agentic work11
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge05
Web design08
General018
All shared boards244
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14
Coding benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
LMArena WebDev1238Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
AA Coding Index25.849.3Nemotron 3 Ultra
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SciCode40.6%40.3%Trinity Large Thinking
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.7%36.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
FrontierCodeNot measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
WeirdMLNot measured43.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: coding13571468Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: software and IT13621468Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena WebDev: React1231Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1240Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.822.9Nemotron 3 Ultra
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.0Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Agentic Index1.020.1Nemotron 3 Ultra
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.1%83.3%Trinity Large Thinking
APEX-AgentsNot measured22.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%28.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured85.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured20.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13421452Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: expert13591472Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13561453Nemotron 3 Ultra
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProofBenchNot measured2.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: math13651457Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: mathematical work13501461Nemotron 3 Ultra
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%65.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: science13551465Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13491456Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: legal and government13451452Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: business and finance13291434Nemotron 3 Ultra
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
Design Arena: websites11371145Nemotron 3 Ultra
Design Arena: UI components10421136Nemotron 3 Ultra
Design Arena: game dev10781138Nemotron 3 Ultra
Design Arena: data viz10981142Nemotron 3 Ultra
Design Arena: 3D10811131Nemotron 3 Ultra
Design Arena: all code categories11171146Nemotron 3 Ultra
Design Arena: SVG10161069Nemotron 3 Ultra
Design Arena: ASCII art10411100Nemotron 3 Ultra
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
IFBench56.3%81.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%79.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra
DTBenchNot measured90.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMCANot measured36.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text13401445Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: instruction following13261418Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: creative writing13081399Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: English13561455Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: non-English13251427Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: Chinese13711497Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: German13561472Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: Japanese1312Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena Text: Korean13061384Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: French13661472Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: Spanish13271455Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: Russian13381417Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: Polish13121385Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: multi-turn13201411Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: longer queries13181437Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: writing and language13171406Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12961397Nemotron 3 Ultra
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.0006Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0018Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.015Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.037Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.058Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.144Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Trinity Large Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
SpecificationArcee AI Trinity Large ThinkingNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
MakerArcee AINVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026June 4, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.60
Output $/Mtok$0.80$2.40
Coding indexNot benchmarked30.0
Independent measurements behind it13
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Trinity Large Thinking better than Nemotron 3 Ultra for coding?

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Trinity Large Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Trinity Large Thinking for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($0.80 vs $2.40 per million) and work measured by SciCode or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Thinking or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Trinity Large Thinking costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Trinity Large Thinking or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Trinity Large Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Ultra comparison based on?

46 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Trinity Large Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Nemotron 3 Ultra's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next