Nova Pro 1.0 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Updated October 21, 2026. 4 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
- Shared results
- 4
- Nova Pro 1.0 only
- 38
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
- 28
- Like-for-like categories
- 4 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads, 39.5 against 7.0.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads, 1312 against 796.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a Vals Index result, 61.3%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens against 300K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Nova Pro 1.0 $0.0024, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Web design, 64.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- Design Arena: websites: Nova Pro 1.0 796 against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 1312, 64.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 per million output tokens, 5.3x apart.
- Context window
- Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Nova Pro 1.0 | Bars | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 1 | ||
| General | 0 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 4 |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 96.0% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1664 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 31.8% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.7% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.2% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.3% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 55.9% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1622.0 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1270 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1271 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1667 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1687 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.0 | 39.5 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1233 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 79.5% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 76.0% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 50.9% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.0% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.4% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.2% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.2% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.8% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 89.1% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 49.9% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.2% | 43.3% | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1246 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1211 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1259 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 7.0 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 7.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1252 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1261 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| MMLU | 82.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1255 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1260 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1281 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1229 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 796 | 1312 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1300 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1363 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1335 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1372 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1335 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1244 | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 83.4% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 61.3% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 79.5% | Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured |
| IFBench | 38.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 21.0% | 82.7% | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
| LMArena Text | 1259 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1235 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1212 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Vision | 980 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1276 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1233 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1244 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1243 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1200 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1203 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1271 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1182 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1240 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1246 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1255 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1247 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1210 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 987 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Amazon Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | December 5, 2024 | October 17, 2026 |
| Context window | 300K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.80 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $3.20 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 70.3 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for coding?
Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 comparison based on?
4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.