Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Step 5 Preview
Step 5 Preview leads Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 43.7 to 6.7, and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs 2.7x less per output token ($1.00 vs $2.70 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 24 benchmarks have a result for both.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Step 5 Preview: which to pick
Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($1.00 vs $2.70 per million).
- Shared results
- 24
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
- 11
- Step 5 Preview only
- 37
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Step 5 Preview
Step 5 Preview leads, 43.7 against 6.7.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Step 5 Preview
Step 5 Preview takes 1.05M tokens against 33K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $0.0012, Step 5 Preview $0.0024 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Reasoning, 38.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena Text: Chinese: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 1222 against Step 5 Preview 1500, 46.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
- Context window
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct takes 33K tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Bars | Step 5 Preview | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 4 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| General | 0 | 11 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 24 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Step 5 Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 16.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | 47.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 85.6% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1567 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 31.8% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 70.4% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 39.0% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 38.1% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.8% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 29.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 58.9% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1276 | 1485 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1261 | 1473 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1583 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1556 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1550 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Step 5 Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 6.7 | 43.7 | Step 5 Preview |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.5 | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Step 5 Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 72.8% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 24.0% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 27.5% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.4% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 50.7% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 27.3% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.4% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.1% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.4% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.9% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Vals Science Index | Not measured | 29.6% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Step 5 Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 83.8% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 18.5% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 41.7% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.5% | 46.5% | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1251 | 1461 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1221 | 1485 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1269 | 1454 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1308 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1265 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Step 5 Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | Not measured | 42.0% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| GSM8K | 93.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1251 | 1458 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1243 | 1460 | Step 5 Preview |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Step 5 Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 63.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| MMLU | 79.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| AI2 Reasoning Challenge | 70.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1221 | 1454 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1187 | 1439 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1257 | 1437 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1224 | 1435 | Step 5 Preview |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Step 5 Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 76.9% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index011
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Step 5 Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 63.5% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 58.1% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 88.3% | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| HellaSwag | 83.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| WinoGrande | 80.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text | 1230 | 1440 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1223 | 1438 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1174 | 1409 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1265 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1248 | 1447 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1205 | 1428 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1222 | 1500 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1383 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1438 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1441 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1228 | 1433 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1222 | 1437 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1251 | 1449 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1191 | 1425 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1150 | 1412 | Step 5 Preview |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1290 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1282 | Only Step 5 Preview measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Step 5 Preview | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | StepFun Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | StepFun |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | November 11, 2024 | October 8, 2026 |
| Context window | 33K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.66 | $1.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.00 | $2.70 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 61.1 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct better than Step 5 Preview for coding?
Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($1.00 vs $2.70 per million).
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Step 5 Preview?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Step 5 Preview?
Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks is the Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?
24 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.