Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o3 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Updated October 21, 2026. 11 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

o3OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
20.2
Output $/M
$8.00
11
Qwen3 VL 8B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
7.3
Output $/M
$0.75
0
vs boards won of 11 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
11
o3 only
86
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct only
0
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o3 not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 57.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): o3 88.3% against Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct 30.7%, 57.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o3 $8.00 against Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct $0.75 per million output tokens, 10.7x apart.
Context window
o3 takes 200K tokens, Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo3BarsQwen3 VL 8B InstructTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Math20
Knowledge10
General20
All shared boards110
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
Aider polyglot81.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SWE-bench Verified58.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal36.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)80.8%35.3%o3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.1%3.8%o3
GSO-Bench8.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
WeirdML52.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
ALE-Bench933.5Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: coding1407Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1415Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.27.3o3
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%29.2%o3
METR time horizons65.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
GDPval30.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.2%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
OSWorld23.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond84.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)82.7%57.9%o3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.1%3.8%o3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)81.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
ARC-AGI60.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
ARC-AGI-26.5%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SimpleBench53.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Chess puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Mystery game puzzles29.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
VPCT52.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1402Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: expert1402Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1411Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1220Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1234Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
AIME85.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.6%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
AA Math Index88.330.7o3
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)88.3%30.7%o3
OTIS Mock AIME84.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 333.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MATH level 597.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: math1426Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1423Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro85.6%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.6%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.7%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.3%74.9%o3
SimpleQA Verified49.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
GeoBench74.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: science1429Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1448Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1428Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1393Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1036Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1017Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1034Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1200Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1020Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)41.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.7%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
IFBench71.4%39.9%o3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.7%33.3%o3
DTBench84.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMCA39.7%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Fiction.LiveBench88.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)83.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
CL-bench17.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text1410Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1368Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1359Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision1214Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: English1417Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1401Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1437Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: German1420Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1403Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1370Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: French1430Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1395Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1406Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1438Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1405Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1372Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1372Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1373Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: English1221Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1237Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1218Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1222Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1210Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1234Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1201Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o3$0.0060Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o3$0.124Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.015Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o3$0.480Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.058Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o3 and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI o3Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 16, 2025October 14, 2025
Context window200K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.25
Output $/Mtok$8.00$0.75
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$0.571Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o3 better than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, o3 or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

o3 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs $0.25 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for o3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, o3 or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the o3 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. o3's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next