Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o3 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

o3 leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.2 to 9.9, and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs 4.2x less per output token ($1.90 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 49 benchmarks have a result for both.

o3OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
51.1
Output $/M
$8.00
16
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
31
vs boards won of 49 shared, 2 tied

o3 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
49
o3 only
53
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
0
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o3 not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 26.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: o3 80.7% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 54.1%, 26.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o3 $8.00 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 4.2x apart.
Context window
o3 takes 200K tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo3BarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding22
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning25
Math202 ties
Knowledge23
General621
All shared boards16312 ties
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22
Coding benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Aider polyglot81.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SWE-bench Verified58.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal36.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)80.8%64.6%o3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.1%11.4%o3
GSO-Bench8.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
WeirdML52.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
ALE-Bench933.5Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14071438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT14151442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SciCode9.2%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.29.9o3
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%54.1%o3
METR time horizons65.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
GDPval30.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.2%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
OSWorld23.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)63.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
BrowseComp-Plus65.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25
Reasoning benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond84.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)82.7%77.2%o3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.1%11.9%o3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)81.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
ARC-AGI60.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
ARC-AGI-26.5%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SimpleBench53.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Chess puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Mystery game puzzles29.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
VPCT52.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14021428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert14021442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14111439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagrams12201255Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: homework12341277Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.6%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AIME85.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.6%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
AA Math Index88.388.3Tie
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)88.3%88.3%Tie
OTIS Mock AIME84.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 333.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MATH level 597.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: math14261425o3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14231419o3
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Knowledge benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro85.6%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.6%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.7%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.3%83.6%o3
SimpleQA Verified49.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
GeoBench74.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: science14291444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14481431o3
LMArena Text: legal and government14281438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance13931433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
FACTS Benchmark Suite44.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1036Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1017Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1034Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1200Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1020Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index621
General benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)41.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.7%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
IFBench71.4%56.5%o3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.7%63.7%o3
DTBench84.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMCA39.7%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Fiction.LiveBench88.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)83.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
CL-bench17.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text14101420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following13681406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing13591366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision12141247Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: English14171429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English14011405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese14371463Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German14201424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese14031385o3
LMArena Text: Korean13701394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French14301452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish13951428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian14061408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish14381419o3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries13721419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language13721392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13731368o3
LMArena Vision: English12211256Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: Chinese12371283Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: reading text12181253Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: humor12221209o3
LMArena Vision: captioning12101281Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12341249Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: creative writing12011220Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o3 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmarko3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o3$0.0060Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o3$0.124Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o3$0.480Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o3 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI o3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 16, 2025September 23, 2025
Context window200K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.21
Output $/Mtok$8.00$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$0.571Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o3 better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, o3 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

o3 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for o3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, o3 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the o3 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

49 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. o3's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next