Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Hy3

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 3.6x less per output token than Hy3 ($0.147 vs $0.528 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA
Coding
22.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.147
0
Hy3Tencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Hy3: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has a coding score, 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Hy3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Hy3 for work measured by SciCode or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Shared results
5
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning only
15
Hy3 only
39
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 22.6 from 2 benchmarks, Hy3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 19.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 10.6% against Hy3 33.5%, 22.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning $0.147 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 3.6x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3.5 LightningBarsHy3Ties
Coding02
Reasoning02
General01
All shared boards05
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Hy3
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningHy3Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1507Only Hy3 measured
AA Coding Index26.8Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Code migration (Vals AI)3.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)10.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)29.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
SciCode32.1%48.6%Hy3
ALE-Bench769.2838.6Hy3
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1511Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Hy3
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningHy3Leader
AA Intelligence Index12.9Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Hy3
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningHy3Leader
AA Agentic Index3.5Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)18.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)2.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)17.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Hy3
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningHy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)74.3%89.7%Hy3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)10.6%33.5%Hy3
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1461Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1455Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Hy3
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningHy3Leader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1473Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1482Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Hy3
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningHy3Leader
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.2%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1452Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1422Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1424Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Hy3
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningHy3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1204Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1208Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1164Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1232Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1227Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1200Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1152Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Hy3
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningHy3Leader
MedScribe (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)60.3%79.0%Hy3
LMArena TextNot measured1438Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1403Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1448Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1485Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1449Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1397Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1396Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1456Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1432Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1436Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1442Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1414Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1400Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Hy3
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0001Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0031Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.012Fits in one request
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Hy3
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 LightningTencent Hy3
MakerNVIDIATencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 11, 2026July 6, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.0534$0.132
Output $/Mtok$0.147$0.528
Coding index22.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$0.06Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better than Hy3 for coding?

Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has a coding score, 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Hy3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Hy3 for work measured by SciCode or ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Hy3?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs $0.0534 per million input tokens and $0.147 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Hy3?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Hy3 comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next