Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct vs o3

o3 leads Mixtral 8x22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.2 to 5.7, and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs 1.3x less per output token ($6.00 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mixtral 8x22B InstructMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
0
o3OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
51.1
Output $/M
$8.00
8
vs boards won of 8 shared

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct or o3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mixtral 8x22B Instruct for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($6.00 vs $8.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or SciCode, where it leads.

Shared results
8
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct only
0
o3 only
94
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct not benchmarked, o3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 37.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 14.8% against o3 80.8%, 66.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct $6.00 against o3 $8.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct takes 66K tokens, o3 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMixtral 8x22B InstructBarso3Ties
Coding02
Intelligence02
Reasoning02
Knowledge01
General01
All shared boards08
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22B Instructo3Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured81.3%Only o3 measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured58.4%Only o3 measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured36.0%Only o3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only o3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)14.8%80.8%o3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.1%Only o3 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured8.8%Only o3 measured
WeirdMLNot measured52.4%Only o3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured933.5Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1407Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1415Only o3 measured
SciCode0.0%9.2%o3
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22B Instructo3Leader
AA Intelligence Index5.720.2o3
Epoch Capabilities Index122.0146.7o3
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22B Instructo3Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured80.7%Only o3 measured
METR time horizonsNot measured65.4%Only o3 measured
GDPvalNot measured30.8%Only o3 measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured45.2%Only o3 measured
OSWorldNot measured23.0%Only o3 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured63.0%Only o3 measured
BrowseComp-PlusNot measured65.9%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22B Instructo3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured84.1%Only o3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only o3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)33.2%82.7%o3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.0%20.1%o3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured81.8%Only o3 measured
ARC-AGINot measured60.8%Only o3 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured6.5%Only o3 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured53.1%Only o3 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only o3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured29.0%Only o3 measured
VPCTNot measured52.0%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1402Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1402Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1411Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1220Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1234Only o3 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured67.6%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22B Instructo3Leader
AIMENot measured85.3%Only o3 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.6%Only o3 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured91.8%Only o3 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only o3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only o3 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured84.4%Only o3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured33.3%Only o3 measured
MATH level 5Not measured97.8%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1426Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1423Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22B Instructo3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured85.6%Only o3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only o3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only o3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.6%Only o3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.7%Only o3 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.1%Only o3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured47.3%Only o3 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)53.7%85.3%o3
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured49.4%Only o3 measured
GeoBenchNot measured74.0%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1429Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1448Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1428Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1393Only o3 measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured44.4%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22B Instructo3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1036Only o3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1017Only o3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1034Only o3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1200Only o3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1020Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22B Instructo3Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured41.8%Only o3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.7%Only o3 measured
IFBenchNot measured71.4%Only o3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured74.7%Only o3 measured
DTBench55.1%84.8%o3
LMCANot measured39.7%Only o3 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured88.9%Only o3 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured83.9%Only o3 measured
CL-benchNot measured17.8%Only o3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1410Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1368Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1359Only o3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1214Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1417Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1401Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1437Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1420Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1403Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1370Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1430Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1395Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1406Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1438Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1405Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1372Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1372Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1373Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1221Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1237Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1218Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1222Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1210Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1234Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1201Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and o3
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22B Instructo3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.0050Fits in one request
o3$0.0060Fits in one request

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.118Fits in one request
o3$0.124Fits in one request

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.460Exceeds the context window
o3$0.480Exceeds the context window

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mixtral 8x22B Instruct and o3
SpecificationMistral Mixtral 8x22B InstructOpenAI o3
MakerMistral AIOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 17, 2024April 16, 2025
Context window66K200K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$6.00$8.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.571
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mixtral 8x22B Instruct better than o3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mixtral 8x22B Instruct for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($6.00 vs $8.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or SciCode, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct or o3?

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; o3 costs $2.00 and $8.00. Cost per solved task is known for o3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct or o3?

o3, with 200K tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks is the Mixtral 8x22B Instruct vs o3 comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and o3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next