LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark Open vs Qwen3 32B

Updated October 21, 2026. 5 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
62.1
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.25
5
Qwen3 32BQwen
Coding
40.0
Overall
7.3
Output $/M
$0.28
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 40.0 for Qwen3 32B.

Pick Qwen3 32B when output tokens cost 15.2x less.

Shared results
5
Muse Spark Open only
21
Qwen3 32B only
37
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark Open 62.1 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3 32B 40.0 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
General, 78.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Muse Spark Open 78.3% against Qwen3 32B 0.0%, 78.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark Open $4.25 against Qwen3 32B $0.28 per million output tokens, 15.2x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark Open takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 32B 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark OpenBarsQwen3 32BTies
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards50
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3 32BLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured40.0%Only Qwen3 32B measured
LiveBench coding73.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev1528Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured54.6%Only Qwen3 32B measured
SciCode58.4%36.0%Muse Spark Open
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.0%Only Qwen3 32B measured
ALE-Bench1590.1Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1357Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1366Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1529Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1495Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3 32BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured7.3Only Qwen3 32B measured
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1138.4Muse Spark Open
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3 32BLeader
LiveBench research80.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browser36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agentic18.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)61.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)53.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured29.8%Only Qwen3 32B measured
APEX-Agents33.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3 32BLeader
LiveBench reasoning73.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.0%66.8%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.9%7.4%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured65.7%Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1334Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1362Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1350Only Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3 32BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured73.0Only Qwen3 32B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured73.0%Only Qwen3 32B measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured66.9%Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1399Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1420Only Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3 32BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured79.8%Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1372Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1368Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1324Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1318Only Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3 32BLeader
Design Arena: websites1311Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game dev1290Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench design60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3 32BLeader
LiveBench data analysis60.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
IFBenchNot measured36.3%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%0.0%Muse Spark Open
DTBenchNot measured67.5%Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMCANot measured17.3%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured74.2%Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena TextNot measured1340Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1305Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1297Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1359Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1317Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1357Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1341Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1311Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1331Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1327Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1298Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1279Only Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenQwen3 32BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request
Qwen3 32B$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request
Qwen3 32B$0.0048Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request
Qwen3 32B$0.019Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 32B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark Open and Qwen3 32B
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark OpenQwen3 32B
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026April 28, 2025
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.08
Output $/Mtok$4.25$0.28
Coding index62.140.0
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark Open better than Qwen3 32B for coding?

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 40.0 for Qwen3 32B. Pick Qwen3 32B when output tokens cost 15.2x less.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark Open or Qwen3 32B?

Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B costs $0.08 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark Open or Qwen3 32B?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark Open vs Qwen3 32B comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Spark Open's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 32B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next