Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Scout vs Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.3 to 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout costs 1.2x less per output token ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$0.50
0
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
33
vs boards won of 33 shared

Llama 4 Scout or Hy3 preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
33
Llama 4 Scout only
49
Hy3 preview only
3
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked, Hy3 preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 50.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Llama 4 Scout 15.5% against Hy3 preview 92.7%, 77.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 4 Scout $0.50 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 4 ScoutBarsHy3 previewTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General015
All shared boards033
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutHy3 previewLeader
SWE-bench Verified9.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1357Only Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding Index8.258.8Hy3 preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
SciCode21.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%34.1%Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: coding12861421Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: software and IT12861423Hy3 preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutHy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.525.3Hy3 preview
Epoch Capabilities Index129.6Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutHy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic Index0.524.1Hy3 preview
τ²-Bench Telecom15.5%92.7%Hy3 preview
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)28.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutHy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond47.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.7%86.7%Hy3 preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%27.8%Hy3 preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)51.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI0.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12661413Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: expert12351422Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12931416Hy3 preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams1125Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: homework1148Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark36.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutHy3 previewLeader
AIME19.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MGSM (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Math Index14.0Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
OTIS Mock AIME7.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH level 562.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: math12871424Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work12861442Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutHy3 previewLeader
MMLU Pro69.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)72.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)55.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedQA (Vals AI)50.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedCode (Vals AI)23.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: science12781416Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751405Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: legal and government12851430Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: business and finance12571397Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutHy3 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites750Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: UI components765Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: game dev772Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: data viz896Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: all code categories789Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index015
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutHy3 previewLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)34.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)50.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
IFBench39.5%63.1%Hy3 preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)27.7%64.7%Hy3 preview
DTBench57.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMCA12.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Fiction.LiveBench36.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text12791401Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: instruction following12481383Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: creative writing12491339Hy3 preview
LMArena Vision1118Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: English13041409Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: non-English12521390Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Chinese12551435Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: German1273Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1206Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Korean1207Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: French12831425Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Spanish12781399Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Russian12631399Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Polish1265Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12801411Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: longer queries12651402Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: writing and language12691370Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12421352Hy3 preview
LMArena Vision: English1143Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1106Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1117Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: humor1102Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1126Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutHy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.0004Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.010Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.040Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Scout and Hy3 preview
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 ScoutTencent Hy3 preview
MakerMeta LlamaTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 5, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window1.31M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.175$0.18
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved task$1.276Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Hy3 preview?

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Scout only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Scout or Hy3 preview?

Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Scout vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Scout's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next