Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 18.2 to 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout costs 2.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 15 benchmarks have a result for both.
Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $1.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 262K tokens).
- Shared results
- 15
- Llama 4 Scout only
- 67
- Qwen3.6 35B A3B only
- 5
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads, 18.2 against 6.5.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads, 13.1 against 0.5.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Llama 4 Scout has a GPQA Diamond result, 47.0%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Llama 4 Scout has a AIME result, 19.0%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Llama 4 Scout has a MMLU Pro result, 69.6%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Llama 4 Scout has a Design Arena: websites result, 750.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout $0.0004, Qwen3.6 35B A3B $0.0006 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Llama 4 Scout has the number, $1.276.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 35B A3B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 78.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- τ²-Bench Telecom: Llama 4 Scout 15.5% against Qwen3.6 35B A3B 95.3%, 79.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Llama 4 Scout $0.50 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
- Context window
- Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens, Qwen3.6 35B A3B 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Llama 4 Scout | Bars | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 3 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 3 | ||
| Math | 0 | 1 | ||
| General | 0 | 4 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 15 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 9.1% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| AA Coding Index | 8.2 | 41.9 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 38.5% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 29.9% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| SciCode | 21.3% | 36.6% | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 1.5% | 34.8% | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 24.6% | Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 34.5% | Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1286 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1286 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 6.5 | 18.2 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.6 | 143.7 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 0.5 | 13.1 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 15.5% | 95.3% | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 28.1% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 58.8% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 58.7% | 84.1% | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.8% | 22.2% | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 51.8% | 84.8% | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| ARC-AGI | 0.5% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 22.0% | Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1266 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1235 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1293 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1125 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1148 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 36.9% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 19.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 79.2% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 88.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| AA Math Index | 14.0 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 7.8% | 86.7% | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 20.4% | Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured |
| MATH level 5 | 62.3% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1287 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1286 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 69.6% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 72.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 46.8% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 55.2% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 57.8% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 50.9% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 23.3% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 75.2% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1278 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1275 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1285 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1257 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 750 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 765 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 772 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 896 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 789 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 34.8% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 50.6% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| IFBench | 39.5% | 64.4% | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 27.7% | 71.7% | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| DTBench | 57.9% | 73.9% | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| LMCA | 12.0% | 29.7% | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 36.0% | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 44.4% | Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured |
| LMArena Text | 1279 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1248 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1249 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1118 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1304 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1252 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1255 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1273 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1206 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1207 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1283 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1278 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1263 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1265 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1280 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1265 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1269 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1242 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1143 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1106 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1117 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1102 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1126 | Not measured | Only Llama 4 Scout measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.6 35B A3B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Llama 4 Scout costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Meta Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta Llama | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | April 5, 2025 | April 27, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.31M | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.175 | $0.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.50 | $1.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.276 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Llama 4 Scout better than Qwen3.6 35B A3B for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $1.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 262K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.10 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Scout only.
Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B comparison based on?
15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Scout's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 35B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.