Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 7.5 to 6.5, and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 1.7x less per output token ($0.30 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 45 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$0.50
0
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
41.5
Output $/M
$0.30
45
vs boards won of 45 shared

Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Scout for a larger context window (1.31M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or SciCode, where it leads.

Shared results
45
Llama 4 Scout only
37
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
0
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 39.6 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Llama 4 Scout 7.8% against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 62.2%, 54.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 4 Scout $0.50 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 4 ScoutBarsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning06
Math05
Knowledge05
General021
All shared boards045
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
SWE-bench Verified9.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Coding Index8.2Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.9%70.7%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
SciCode21.3%33.0%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%6.1%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: coding12861416Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: software and IT12861417Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.57.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Epoch Capabilities Index129.6Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Agentic Index0.5Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
τ²-Bench Telecom15.5%28.1%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)28.1%41.4%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond47.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.7%70.7%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%10.3%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)51.8%55.6%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
ARC-AGI0.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12661398Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: expert12351397Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12931406Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Vision: diagrams1125Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: homework1148Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark36.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AIME19.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MGSM (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Math Index14.066.3Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%66.3%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
OTIS Mock AIME7.8%62.2%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
MATH level 562.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: math12871394Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: mathematical work12861411Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro69.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)72.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)55.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedQA (Vals AI)50.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedCode (Vals AI)23.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%80.5%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: science12781393Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751392Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: legal and government12851387Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: business and finance12571389Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites750Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: UI components765Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: game dev772Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: data viz896Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: all code categories789Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index021
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)34.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)50.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
IFBench39.5%50.7%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)27.7%61.3%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
DTBench57.9%67.2%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMCA12.0%22.4%Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Fiction.LiveBench36.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text12791384Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: instruction following12481363Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: creative writing12491317Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Vision1118Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: English13041391Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: non-English12521372Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Chinese12551432Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: German12731379Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Japanese12061337Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Korean12071330Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: French12831419Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Spanish12781404Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Russian12631369Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Polish12651353Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: multi-turn12801378Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: longer queries12651378Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: writing and language12691336Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12421334Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Vision: English1143Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1106Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1117Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: humor1102Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1126Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.010Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0054Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.040Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.021Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 ScoutQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 5, 2025July 29, 2025
Context window1.31M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.175$0.09
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved task$1.276Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Scout for a larger context window (1.31M against 262K tokens) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or SciCode, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Scout only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

45 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Scout's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next